Rhaphiolepis bibas (Lour.) Galasso & Banfi

← Back to the species catalog

Identidad taxonómica

Scientific name: Rhaphiolepis bibas (Lour.) Galasso & Banfi
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.: Rhaphiolepis bibas
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.: (Lour.) Galasso & Banfi
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).: Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.: Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).: Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).: Rosales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).: Rosaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.: Rhaphiolepis
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.: bibas
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.: species
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.: accepted name

Photos and conservation status

IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.: Not evaluated (NE)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-09 08:16.

Photo of Rhaphiolepis bibas (Lour.) Galasso & Banfi — Photo: Piermario Maculan · CC0 1.0 · View original image · Original observation

Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-09 08:16.

Interacciones documentadas

GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.

A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.

Types shown: 1 of 15 has its flowers visited by × 14 more types with data for this species

Flower visit

has its flowers visited by 41 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. Visiting a flower is not pollinating it. «Pollinates» is a different term and a different block, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
European Honey Bee Apis mellifera Apidae	has its flowers visited by	21	not compared
21 sources · 21 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/100852822 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 11, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/101936398 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 26, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102387862 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 2, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102389405 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 1, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102389406 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 1, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102603811 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 6, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103130305 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 13, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103130514 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 15, 2021 · Human observation And 13 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Asian Hornet Vespa velutina Vespidae	has its flowers visited by	7	not compared
7 sources · 7 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103761006 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 11, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/325710415 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 9, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/63474308 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 24, 2020 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/64432313 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 8, 2020 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/64432380 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 8, 2020 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/66268664 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 6, 2020 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/98370064 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 16, 2021 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Common Eastern Bumble Bee Bombus impatiens Apidae	has its flowers visited by	7	not compared
7 sources · 7 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/99284632 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 24, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/99284636 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 24, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103129801 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 11, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103130303 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 13, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103275016 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 18, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/139370699 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 19, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/191989616 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 24, 2023 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Clavipes Sphinx Aellopos clavipes Sphingidae	has its flowers visited by	5	not compared
5 sources · 5 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/30660784 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 9, 2019 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/140274819 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 27, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/140803634 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 1, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/140803706 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 1, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/140994140 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 2, 2022 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 41, by number of studies See more of this type

Interaction data from Global Biotic Interactions (GloBI), GloBI 0.11. Each row keeps the citation its own study published.

Interactions are published at species level: they are not resolved by variety or race.

Each block is headed by the source's own term, read from this species' end — not by a category of ours. Two similar terms are not merged.

«Documented here» means the interaction was observed in this territory. It is not evidence that the species is here, and it does not enter the niche model.

Acompañantes documentados

This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.

Documented uses and recommendations

Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.

Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.