Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L. — The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Tamarindus indica
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank. — The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi). — One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division. — Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida). — Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera). — Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Fabales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family). — Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Fabaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays. — Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Tamarindus
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays. — The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
indica
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies. — The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Reference species
Tamarindus indica
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful. — Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name
Photos and conservation status
IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area. — The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Least concern (LC)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-13 11:17.
Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-13 11:17.
Interacciones documentadas
GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.
A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.
Types shown: 6 of 6
is a host of
×
is eaten by
×
has as a vector
×
interacts with
×
is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of
×
is a symbiont of
×
Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.
is a host of
60 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Bacillus subtilisBacillaceae
is a host of
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
Wardeh, M., Risley, C., McIntyre, M. et al. Database of host-pathogen and related species interactions, and their global distribution. Sci Data 2, 150049 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.49. Accessed at <https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/wardeh2015/archive/90…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/wardeh2015
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9299864
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9327766
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Pod MothCryptophlebia peltasticaTortricidae
is a host of
2
no location
2 sources · 3 records
Gaden S. Robinson; Phillip R. Ackery; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Luis M. Hernández (2023). HOSTS (from HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants) [Data set resource]. Natural History Museum. https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/hosts/resource/877f387a-36a3-486c-…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/HOSTS
Record contexts (sample): Afrotropical · no date published; Micronesia · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Afrotropical · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6580387
Micronesia · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6580511
Bradley J. D., 1953a, Some important species of the genus Cryptophlebia Walsingham, 1899, with descriptions of three new species (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). vol 43 issue 4 pages 679–689, pls 24–25
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2017
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1322157
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Selepa celtisNolidae
is a host of
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
Moore F., 1858–1860, In: Horsfield, Th. & Moore, F. – A catalogue of the lepidopterous insects in the Museum of Natural History at the East-India House. vol 2 issue pages 279–440, 1–6, pls 13–23, 7a–13a
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2017
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1323308
No public URL for this record
Gaden S. Robinson; Phillip R. Ackery; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Luis M. Hernández (2023). HOSTS (from HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants) [Data set resource]. Natural History Museum. https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/hosts/resource/877f387a-36a3-486c-…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/HOSTS
Context: Thailand · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Thailand · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6635669
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Mango Flower WebwormDudua aprobolaTortricidae
is a host of
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
Pathania P. C., Das A., Brown J. W. & Chandra K., 2020, Catalogue of Tortricidae Latreille, 1802 (Lepidoptera: Tortricoidea) of India. vol 4757 issue 1 pages 1–95
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2017
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1321780
No public URL for this record
Gaden S. Robinson; Phillip R. Ackery; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Luis M. Hernández (2023). HOSTS (from HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants) [Data set resource]. Natural History Museum. https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/hosts/resource/877f387a-36a3-486c-…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/HOSTS
Context: India · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
India · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6579106
This term does declare that the organism harms this species.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Leptocentrus taurusMembracidae
is eaten by
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
Yuan, F. & Chou, I. (2002a) <i>Fauna Sinica. Insecta. Volume 28. Homoptera. Membracoidea: Aetalionidae Membracidae.</i> Science Press, Beijing, China, xix + 590 pp. + IV pls. [in Chinese]
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1304883
No public URL for this record
Ananthasubramanian, K.S. (1996a) <i>Fauna of India. Homoptera Membracidae.</i> Asian Printers, Calcutta, xviii + 534 pp. + IX pls.
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1308560
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Otinotus oneratusMembracidae
is eaten by
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
Rajkumar, K., Tennyson, S. & Arivoli, S. (2023) Ecology of <i>Otinotus oneratus</i> Walker (Hemiptera: Membracidae) on its host plant <i>Tamarindus indica</i>. <i>Indian Journal of Entomology</i>, 85(3), 623–628.
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1308276
No public URL for this record
Ananthasubramanian, K.S. (1996a) <i>Fauna of India. Homoptera Membracidae.</i> Asian Printers, Calcutta, xviii + 534 pp. + IX pls.
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1308553
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Ebhul variusMembracidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Yuan, F. & Chou, I. (2002a) <i>Fauna Sinica. Insecta. Volume 28. Homoptera. Membracoidea: Aetalionidae Membracidae.</i> Science Press, Beijing, China, xix + 590 pp. + IV pls. [in Chinese]
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1304850
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Aetalion reticulatumAetalionidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Resende, L.S., Moreira, L.B., Carvalho, V.C. & Carvalho, G.A. (2021) First report of <i>Aethalion reticulatum</i> (Linnaeus, 1767) (Hemiptera: Aethalionidae) infesting plants of <i>Coffea arabica</i> (Linnaeus, 1753) (Rubiaceae). <i>Coffee Science</i>, 16, 1–5. https://doi.o…
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1302162
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Ring-tailed LemurLemur cattaLemuridae
has as a vector
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
Yamashita, N., 2002. Diets of two lemur species in different microhabitats in Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve; Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 23(5), pp.1025-1051.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9139897
No public URL for this record
Simmen, B. and Hladik, A. and Ramasiarisoa, P., 2003. Food intake and dietary overlap in native Lemur catta and Propithecus verreauxi and introduced Eulemur fulvus at Berenty; southern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 24(5), pp.949-968.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9139985
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Verreaux's SifakaPropithecus verreauxiIndriidae
has as a vector
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
Yamashita, N., 2002. Diets of two lemur species in different microhabitats in Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve; Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 23(5), pp.1025-1051.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9139892
No public URL for this record
Simmen, B. and Hladik, A. and Ramasiarisoa, P., 2003. Food intake and dietary overlap in native Lemur catta and Propithecus verreauxi and introduced Eulemur fulvus at Berenty; southern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 24(5), pp.949-968.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9139929
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Kalemera, MC, 1989. Observations on feeding preference of elephants in the Acacia tortilis woodland of Lake Manyara National Park; Tanzania. African Journal of Ecology, 27(4), pp.325-333.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9138923
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Olive BaboonPapio anubisCercopithecidae
has as a vector
1
no location
1 source · 2 records
Kunz, B.K. and Linsenmair, K.E., 2008. The role of the olive baboon Papio anubis; Cercopithecidae as seed disperser in a savanna-forest mosaic of West Africa. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 24(3), pp.235-246.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published · germination tests; no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · germination testsAs published: germination testsWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9140835
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9140843
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Agrilus tardulusBuprestidae
interacts with
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
@book{123766, author = {Jendek, Eduard and Poláková, Janka}, booktitle = {Host Plants of World Agrilus (Coleoptera, Buprestidae). A Critical Review}, pages = {706}, publisher = {Springer Cham}, year = {2014} }
Published in globalbioticinteractions/taxonworks
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5917881
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Context: Los Banos College campus · May 1, 1920 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Los Banos College campus · May 1, 1920 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1920-05-01T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L17099739
Context: Monroe County, Key West · Feb. 28, 1984 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Monroe County, Key West · Feb. 28, 1984 · Material sampleAs published: 1984-02-28T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12910125
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 4 of 4, by number of studies
is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of
3 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
RhizophagusMonotomidae
is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of
1
no location
Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at genus level.
1 source · 5 records
Medina, 2003. Interactions of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi and Bacillus Strains and their effects on plant growth. microbial rhizosphere activity (thymidine and leucine incorporation) and fungal biomass (ergosterol and chitin). Applied Soil Ecology. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.28
Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycodb
Record contexts (sample): lab · no date published; lab · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
lab · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12283513
lab · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12283582
lab · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12283807
And 2 more records of this source, not listed here.
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
FunneliformisGlomeraceae
is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of
1
no location
Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at genus level.
1 source · 1 record
Medina, 2003. Interactions of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi and Bacillus Strains and their effects on plant growth. microbial rhizosphere activity (thymidine and leucine incorporation) and fungal biomass (ergosterol and chitin). Applied Soil Ecology. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.28
Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycodb
Context: lab · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
lab · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12283620
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
AcaulosporaAcaulosporaceae
is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of
1
no location
Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at genus level.
1 source · 1 record
Medina, 2003. Interactions of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi and Bacillus Strains and their effects on plant growth. microbial rhizosphere activity (thymidine and leucine incorporation) and fungal biomass (ergosterol and chitin). Applied Soil Ecology. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.28
Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycodb
Context: lab · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
lab · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12283467
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 3 of 3, by number of studies
is a symbiont of
1 organism
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Fungi Including LichensFungi
is a symbiont of
1
no location
Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at kingdom level.
1 source · 2 records
Perez TM, Valverde-Barrantes O, Bravo C, Taylor CC, Fadrique B, Hogan JA, Pardo CJ, Stroud JT, Baraloto C, Feeley KJ. 2018. Botanic gardens are an untapped resource for studying the functional traits of tropical plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 374: 201…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/fred
Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L24446651
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L24446688
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
Acompañantes documentados
This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.
Documented uses and recommendations
Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.
Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.
