Myrtillocactus geometrizans (Mart. ex Pfeiff.) Console
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L. — The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Myrtillocactus geometrizans
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank. — The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
(Mart. ex Pfeiff.) Console
Common names
Blue Myrtle-cactus, bilberry cactus, blue-flame, our-father, whortleberry cactusNames in other languages (13)Blue Flame, Cacto-mirtilo, Garambullo, Heidelbeerkaktus, Our Father, Padre Nuestro, blåbärskaktus, myrtilokaktus pravidelný, rosyntjiekaktus, sinihärmekaktus, vela-azul, Миртиллокактус геометрический, リュウジンボク
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi). — One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division. — Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida). — Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera). — Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Caryophyllales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family). — Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Cactaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays. — Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Myrtillocactus
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays. — The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
geometrizans
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies. — The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Reference species
Myrtillocactus geometrizans
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful. — Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name
Photos and conservation status
IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area. — The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Not available.
No photos have been requested for this species yet.
Interacciones documentadas
GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.
A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.
Types shown: 7 of 7
has its flowers visited by
×
is eaten by
×
interacts with
×
is a host of
×
has as a parasite
×
visits the flowers of
×
is adjacent to
×
Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.
Flower visit
has its flowers visited by
8 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. Visiting a flower is not pollinating it. «Pollinates» is a different term and a different block, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
European Honey BeeApis melliferaApidae
has its flowers visited by
5
not compared
5 sources · 7 records
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/2881426
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Record contexts (sample): no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observation; no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observationAs published: 2016-04-04T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4533277
no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observationAs published: 2016-04-04T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4533278
Record contexts (sample): no place published · March 25, 2015 · Human observation; no place published · March 25, 2015 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · March 25, 2015 · Human observationAs published: 2015-03-25T18:12:10Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4596643
no place published · March 25, 2015 · Human observationAs published: 2015-03-25T18:12:10Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4596644
Context: no place published · Feb. 26, 2012 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Feb. 26, 2012 · Human observationAs published: 2012-02-26T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4488555
Context: no place published · March 15, 2022 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · March 15, 2022 · Human observationAs published: 2022-03-15T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4601156
Context: no place published · Feb. 22, 2020 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Feb. 22, 2020 · Human observationAs published: 2020-02-22T18:15:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5278206
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Phocides lileaHesperiidae
has its flowers visited by
1
not compared
1 source · 3 records
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/21715013
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Record contexts (sample): no place published · March 26, 2019 · Human observation; no place published · March 26, 2019 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · March 26, 2019 · Human observationAs published: 2019-03-26T17:25:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4968690
no place published · March 26, 2019 · Human observationAs published: 2019-03-26T17:25:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4968691
no place published · March 26, 2019 · Human observationAs published: 2019-03-26T17:25:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4968692
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Pipevine SwallowtailBattus philenorPapilionidae
has its flowers visited by
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/2881480
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observationAs published: 2016-04-04T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4533283
Record contexts (sample): no place published · April 1, 2019 · Human observation; no place published · April 1, 2019 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · April 1, 2019 · Human observationAs published: 2019-04-01T18:45:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4972610
no place published · April 1, 2019 · Human observationAs published: 2019-04-01T18:45:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4972611
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. Visiting a flower is not pollinating it. «Pollinates» is a different term and a different block, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
blue-flameMyrtillocactus geometrizansCactaceae
visits the flowers of
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/2881480
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observationAs published: 2016-04-04T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4533281
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Pipevine SwallowtailBattus philenorPapilionidae
visits the flowers of
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/2881480
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observationAs published: 2016-04-04T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4533282
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 2 of 2, by number of studies
is eaten by
7 organisms
This term does declare that the organism harms this species.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
European Honey BeeApis melliferaApidae
is eaten by
3
not compared
3 sources · 3 records
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/1400341
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · Feb. 26, 2012 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Feb. 26, 2012 · Human observationAs published: 2012-02-26T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4488556
Context: no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · April 4, 2016 · Human observationAs published: 2016-04-04T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4533279
Context: no place published · March 15, 2022 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · March 15, 2022 · Human observationAs published: 2022-03-15T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4601155
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Megachile zapotecaMegachilidae
is eaten by
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/26520045
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · May 4, 2019 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · May 4, 2019 · Human observationAs published: 2019-05-04T13:54:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5031839
Context: no place published · April 1, 2019 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · April 1, 2019 · Human observationAs published: 2019-04-01T18:45:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4972612
Context: no place published · April 1, 2019 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · April 1, 2019 · Human observationAs published: 2019-04-01T16:48:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4972600
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Mexidalgus toumeyellusAphelinidae
interacts with
4
no location
4 sources · 4 records
Myartseva, S.N., Coronado-Blanco, J.M., Lomelí-Flores, J.R. & Martínez-Hernández, D.Y. (2014) A new genus for a new species of the family Aphelinidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) from Mexico. <i>Zoosystematica Rossica</i>, 23(1), 131–136.
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:124661
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1251544
No public URL for this record
Myartseva, S.N., García-Guerrero, D.A., Ruíz-Cancino, E. & Coronado-Blanco, J.M. (2014) A new parasitoid species (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae) of a soft scale insect (Hemiptera: Coccidae) from Mexico. <i>Zoosystematica Rossica</i>, 23(2), 264–268.
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:124661
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1251545
No public URL for this record
@article{83251, author = {Myartseva, S.N. and Coronado-Blanco, J.M. and Lomelí-Flores, J.R. and Martínez-Hernández, D.Y.}, booktitle = {Zoosystematica Rossica}, journal = {Zoosystematica Rossica}, month = {jun}, day = {25}, pages = {131-136}, title = {A new genus f…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/taxonworks
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6126312
No public URL for this record
@article{83264, author = {Myartseva, S.N. and García-Guerrero, D.A. and Ruíz-Cancino, E. and Coronado-Blanco, J.M.}, booktitle = {Zoosystematica Rossica}, journal = {Zoosystematica Rossica}, month = {dec}, day = {25}, pages = {264-268}, title = {A new parasitoid sp…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/taxonworks
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6126517
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Context: no place published · May 1, 2022 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · May 1, 2022 · Human observationAs published: 2022-05-01T16:18:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4673973
Context: no place published · April 2, 2023 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · April 2, 2023 · Human observationAs published: 2023-04-02T22:50:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5350117
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Encarsia subelongataAphelinidae
interacts with
2
no location
2 sources · 3 records
@article{83260, author = {Myartseva, S.N. and Evans, G.A.}, booktitle = {Serie avispas parasitícas de plagas y otros insectos}, month = {mar}, day = {14}, pages = {1-320}, publisher = {Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México (ISBN 978-…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/taxonworks
Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6114794
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6114975
No public URL for this record
Myartseva, S.N. & Evans, G.A. (2008) <i>Genus Encarsia Förster of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Aphelinidae). A revision, key and description of new species.</i> <i>Serie avispas parasitícas de plagas y otros insectos</i>, No 3, 1–320.
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:124661
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1238773
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Dichotomophthora indica
is a host of
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Pfeiffer, C.M., Wheeler, J.E., Bach, D.A., and Gilbertson, R.L.. 1989. First report of %Dichotomophthora indica% as a pathogen of %Myrtillocactus geometrizans% and %Gymnocalycium mihanovichii% var. %friedrichii%in Arizona.. Pl. Dis. 73:81
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: United States · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
United States · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4401684
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Peregrine, W.T.H., and Ahmad, K.B.. 1982. Brunei: A first annotated list of plant diseases and associated organisms.. Phytopathol. Pap. 27:1-87
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Brunei Darussalam · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Brunei Darussalam · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4093314
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 3 of 3, by number of studies
has as a parasite
3 organisms
This term does declare that the organism harms this species.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Mexidalgus toumeyellusAphelinidae
has as a parasite
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
MyartsCoLo2014 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18907809
No public URL for this record
MyartsGaRu2014 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18909296
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Encarsia subelongataAphelinidae
has as a parasite
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
MyartsEv2008 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18834658
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Parasitic waspEncarsia citrina
has as a parasite
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
MyartsEv2008 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18834661
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 3 of 3, by number of studies
is adjacent to
1 organism
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
Acompañantes documentados
This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.
Documented uses and recommendations
Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.
Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.