Peach (Prunus persica)

Identidad taxonómica

Scientific name: Prunus persica (L.) Stokes
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.: Prunus persica
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.: (L.) Stokes
Common names: Peach
Names in other languages (5)
Melocoton (ES), Peach (EN), Pfirsich (DE), Pêche (FR), 복사나무
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).: Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.: Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).: Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).: Rosales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).: Rosaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.: Prunus
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.: persica
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.: species
Reference species: Prunus persica
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.: accepted name

Photos and conservation status

IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.: Not evaluated (NE)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-09 08:24.

Photo of Prunus persica (L.) Stokes — Photo: Nico Yak · CC BY 4.0 · View original image · Original observation

Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-09 08:24.

Interacciones documentadas

GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.

A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.

Types shown: 1 of 17 has its flowers visited by × 16 more types with data for this species

Flower visit

has its flowers visited by 66 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. Visiting a flower is not pollinating it. «Pollinates» is a different term and a different block, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
European Honey Bee Apis mellifera Apidae	has its flowers visited by	13	not compared
13 sources · 19 records Ollerton, J., Trunschke, J. ., Havens, K. ., Landaverde-González, P. ., Keller, A. ., Gilpin, A.-M. ., Rodrigo Rech, A. ., Baronio, G. J. ., Phillips, B. J., Mackin, C. ., Stanley, D. A., Treanore, E. ., Baker, E. ., Rotheray, E. L., Erickson, E. ., Fornoff, F. ., Brearley, F. Q… Published in globalbioticinteractions/ollerton2022 Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/271501123 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · April 19, 2025 · Human observation; no place published · April 19, 2025 · Human observation Records of organisms other than plants having flower visitors are probably errors Published in globalbioticinteractions/refuted-biotic-interactions-by-eol Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/204600101 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 30, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/204846531 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 31, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/204846847 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 31, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/107437531 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Feb. 25, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/249342475 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 22, 2024 · Human observation And 5 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Two-spotted Bumble Bee Bombus bimaculatus Apidae	has its flowers visited by	5	not compared
5 sources · 5 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/215077236 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 11, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/345188701 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 25, 2026 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/153919715 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · April 4, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/273504735 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · April 24, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/75694916 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · April 28, 2021 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Eumeninae sp. Vespidae	has its flowers visited by	2	no location	Not a modelling unit: the source did not resolve a species — the name carries an open-nomenclature qualifier.
2 sources · 2 records Ollerton, J., Trunschke, J. ., Havens, K. ., Landaverde-González, P. ., Keller, A. ., Gilpin, A.-M. ., Rodrigo Rech, A. ., Baronio, G. J. ., Phillips, B. J., Mackin, C. ., Stanley, D. A., Treanore, E. ., Baker, E. ., Rotheray, E. L., Erickson, E. ., Fornoff, F. ., Brearley, F. Q… Published in globalbioticinteractions/ollerton2022 Context: no place published · no date published Records of organisms other than plants having flower visitors are probably errors Published in globalbioticinteractions/refuted-biotic-interactions-by-eol Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Eastern Carpenter Xylocopa virginica Apidae	has its flowers visited by	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/206183515 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · April 8, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/176707811 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 7, 2023 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 66, by number of studies See more of this type

Interaction data from Global Biotic Interactions (GloBI), GloBI 0.11. Each row keeps the citation its own study published.

Interactions are published at species level: they are not resolved by variety or race.

Each block is headed by the source's own term, read from this species' end — not by a category of ours. Two similar terms are not merged.

«Documented here» means the interaction was observed in this territory. It is not evidence that the species is here, and it does not enter the niche model.

Acompañantes documentados

This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.

Documented uses and recommendations

Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.

Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.