Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L. — The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Schima wallichii
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank. — The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
(DC.) Korth.
Common names
needlewood, needlewood tree, schima, simartoluNames in other languages (8)hong mu he, mang tan, medang gatal, puspa, samak, Шима Уоллича, มังตาน(ทะโล้), 紅木荷
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi). — One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division. — Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida). — Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera). — Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Ericales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family). — Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Theaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays. — Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Schima
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays. — The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
wallichii
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies. — The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Reference species
Schima wallichii
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful. — Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name
Photos and conservation status
IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area. — The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Least concern (LC)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-09 00:49.
Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.
is eaten by
6 organisms
This term does declare that the organism harms this species.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Litchi Lantern BugPyrops candelariusFulgoridae
is eaten by
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
Jiaranaisakul, K. & Constant, J. (2021) The Lanternflies (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae) of Khao Krachom Mountain, Ratchaburi Province, Thailand. <i>Far Eastern Entomologist</i>, 435, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.435.2
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1301205
Jiaranaisakul, K., Constant, J. & Pinkaew, N. (2024) Review of the lanternfly genus <i>Pyrops</i> of Thailand (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) with notes and keys to species. <i>Zootaxa</i>, 5397(1), 47–79. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5397.1.3
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1304808
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Matsumurasca schimaCicadellidae
is eaten by
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
Thapa, V.K. (2000a) <i>An Inventory of Nepal's Insects. Volume III. Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera & Diptera</i>. IUCN [The World Conservation Union], Nepal, Kathmandu, xi + 475 pp.
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1283577
No public URL for this record
Thapa, V.K. (1985a) Some empoascan leafhoppers (Homoptera, Cicadellidae, Typhlocybinae) from the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. <i>Journal of Entomological Research (New Delhi)</i>, 9(1), 65–74.
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1308601
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Shamala mikraCicadellidae
is eaten by
2
no location
2 sources · 2 records
Sohi, A.S. & Dworakowska, I. (1983a) A review of the Indian Typhlocybinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) from India. <i>Oriental Insects</i>, 17, 159–213.
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1269321
No public URL for this record
Thapa, V.K. (2000a) <i>An Inventory of Nepal's Insects. Volume III. Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Coleoptera & Diptera</i>. IUCN [The World Conservation Union], Nepal, Kathmandu, xi + 475 pp.
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1283591
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Green Snout LanternflyPyrops viridirostris
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Jiaranaisakul, K., Constant, J. & Pinkaew, N. (2024) Review of the lanternfly genus <i>Pyrops</i> of Thailand (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) with notes and keys to species. <i>Zootaxa</i>, 5397(1), 47–79. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5397.1.3
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2317
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1304805
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Colletotrichum sp.Glomerellaceae
is a host of
1
no location
Not a modelling unit: the source did not resolve a species — the name carries an open-nomenclature qualifier.
1 source · 1 record
Truong, H.H., Yamanaka, T., Ono, T., Masuya, H., and Hirooka, Y.. 2020. First report of anthracnose on %Schima mertensiana% caused by %Colletotrichum sp.% in Japan. J. Gen. Pl. Pathol. 86(3):233-236
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Indonesia · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Indonesia · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4433153
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: China · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
China · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4223185
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Tea LeafrollerCaloptilia theivoraGracillariidae
is a host of
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
@misc{ChecklistBankDataset1049, publisher = {Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Belspo}, address = {Brussels, Belgium}, version = {2026-07-01}, url = {http://www.gracillariidae.net}, title = {Global Taxonomic Database of Gracillariidae}, author = {{De Prins}, {Jurate} and {De Prins}…
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:1049
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1173628
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 3 of 3, by number of studies
Acompañantes documentados
This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.
Documented uses and recommendations
Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.
Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.
