Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L. — The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Vepris nobilis
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank. — The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
(Delile) Mziray
Common names
Names in other languages (2)Large-leaved Cherry-orange, uljaspistoslehti
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi). — One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division. — Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida). — Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera). — Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Sapindales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family). — Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Rutaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays. — Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Vepris
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays. — The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
nobilis
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies. — The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful. — Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name
Photos and conservation status
IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area. — The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Least concern (LC)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-09 13:04.
No photo with a publishable licence (CC0 or CC BY) was found for this species on 2026-10-09 13:04.
Interacciones documentadas
GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.
A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.
Types shown: 7 of 7
is a host of
×
is eaten by
×
interacts with
×
has as a vector
×
is adjacent to
×
is pollinated by
×
is a symbiont of
×
Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.
is a host of
14 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Kazi · July 1, 1942 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1942-07-01T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L16563941
Context: Ambia pr. Geleb · April 16, 1891 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Ambia pr. Geleb · April 16, 1891 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1891-04-16T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L16563944
Context: Country uncertain · May 2, 1916 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Country uncertain · May 2, 1916 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1916-05-02T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L16864689
Context: Country uncertain Fout Falls · April 1, 1892 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Country uncertain Fout Falls · April 1, 1892 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1892-04-01T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L16864694
Wakefield, E.M., and Hansford, C.G.. 1948-49. Contributions towards the fungus flora of Uganda. IX. The Uredinales of Uganda. Proc. Linn. Soc. London 161:162-197
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Uganda · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Uganda · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4065220
No public URL for this record
And 4 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here.
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Blastobasis kenya
is a host of
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Adamski D., Copeland R. S., Miller S. E., Hebert P. D. N., Darrow K. & Luke Q., 2010, A review of African Blastobasidae (Lepidoptera: Gelechioidea: Coleophoridae), with new taxa reared from native fruits in Kenya. vol 630 issue pages i–vi, 1–68
Published in urn:lsid:checklistbank.org:dataset:2017
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L1320489
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
This term does declare that the organism harms this species.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Stuhlmann's Blue MonkeyCercopithecus mitis stuhlmanniCercopithecidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Fairgrieve, C. and Muhumuza, G., 2003. Feeding ecology and dietary differences between blue monkey Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni Matschie groups in logged and unlogged forest; Budongo Forest Reserve; Uganda. African Journal of Ecology, 41(2), pp.141-149.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9139304
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Citrus SwallowtailPapilio demodocusPapilionidae
is eaten by
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/9622981
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · Jan. 3, 2018 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Jan. 3, 2018 · Human observationAs published: 2018-01-03T08:40:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4732566
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
GuerezaColobus guerezaCercopithecidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 2 records
Peter J. Fashing, Mortality trends in the African cherry (Prunus africana) and the. implications for colobus monkeys (Colobus guereza) in Kakamega Forest; Kenya(2004), pp.Biological Conservation.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published · direct observation; no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9145249
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9145250
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Pan troglodytesHominidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Newton-Fisher, N.E., 1999. The diet of chimpanzees in the Budongo Forest Reserve; Uganda. African Journal of Ecology, 37(3), pp.344-354.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9138675
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Context: no place published · May 27, 2024 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · May 27, 2024 · Human observationAs published: 2024-05-27T11:17:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4685753
Context: no place published · June 3, 2024 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · June 3, 2024 · Human observationAs published: 2024-06-03T11:47:10Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4715399
Context: no place published · June 10, 2024 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · June 10, 2024 · Human observationAs published: 2024-06-10T06:03:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4736523
Context: no place published · July 31, 2024 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · July 31, 2024 · Human observationAs published: 2024-07-31T10:20:26Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4948475
Context: no place published · Aug. 7, 2024 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Aug. 7, 2024 · Human observationAs published: 2024-08-07T07:35:04Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4973851
Context: no place published · Aug. 27, 2024 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Aug. 27, 2024 · Human observationAs published: 2024-08-27T11:04:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5052318
Context: no place published · Jan. 10, 2025 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Jan. 10, 2025 · Human observationAs published: 2025-01-10T10:37:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5365915
Context: no place published · Jan. 10, 2025 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Jan. 10, 2025 · Human observationAs published: 2025-01-10T10:40:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5365916
Context: no place published · Jan. 28, 2025 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Jan. 28, 2025 · Human observationAs published: 2025-01-28T07:42:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5379474
Context: no place published · Feb. 5, 2025 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Feb. 5, 2025 · Human observationAs published: 2025-02-05T10:22:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5388832
Context: no place published · Aug. 22, 2025 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Aug. 22, 2025 · Human observationAs published: 2025-08-22T05:44:06Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4627132
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Pan troglodytesHominidae
has as a vector
3
no location
3 sources · 3 records
Furuichi, T. and Hashimoto, C. and Tashiro, Y., 2001. Fruit availability and habitat use by chimpanzees in the Kalinzu Forest; Uganda examination of fallback foods. International Journal of Primatology, 22(6), pp.929-945.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9139882
No public URL for this record
Potts, K.B. and Watts, D.P. and Wrangham, R.W., 2011. Comparative feeding ecology of two communities of chimpanzees Pan troglodytes in Kibale National Park; Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 32(3), pp.669-690.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9140158
No public URL for this record
Chapman, C.A. and Chapman, L.J. and Vulinec, K. and Zanne, A. and Lawes, M.J., 2003. Fragmentation and Alteration of Seed Dispersal Processes An Initial Evaluation of Dung Beetles; Seed Fate; and Seedling Diversity1. Biotropica, 35(3), pp.382-393.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · seeds
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · seedsAs published: seedsWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9143597
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
GuerezaColobus guerezaCercopithecidae
has as a vector
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Fashing, P.J., 2001. Feeding ecology of guerezas in the Kakamega Forest; Kenya the importance of Moraceae fruit in their diet. International Journal of Primatology, 22(4), pp.579-609.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9139848
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Robbins, M.M. and McNeilage, A., 2003. Home range and frugivory patterns of mountain gorillas in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park; Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 24(3), pp.467-491.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · direct observationAs published: direct observationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9139918
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
HornbillsBucerotidaeBucerotidae
has as a vector
1
no location
Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at family level.
1 source · 1 record
Chapman, C.A. and Chapman, L.J. and Vulinec, K. and Zanne, A. and Lawes, M.J., 2003. Fragmentation and Alteration of Seed Dispersal Processes An Initial Evaluation of Dung Beetles; Seed Fate; and Seedling Diversity1. Biotropica, 35(3), pp.382-393.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase
Context: no place published · no date published · seeds
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date published · seedsAs published: seedsWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L9143600
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 4 of 4, by number of studies
is adjacent to
1 organism
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
Pollination
is pollinated by
1 organism
This term declares that the organism benefits this species. «Visits the flowers of» is a different term and a different block: a visitor is not a pollinator, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
European Honey BeeApis melliferaApidae
is pollinated by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Onyango, P., Nyunja, R., Sikolia, S. F., & Opande, G. (2019). Inventory, reward value and diversity of Apis mellifera nectariferous and polleniferous forage in Eastern Mau forest, Kenya.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/kalro2023
Context: Kenya-Mau · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Kenya-Mau · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L7054892
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
is a symbiont of
1 organism
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Fungi Including LichensFungi
is a symbiont of
1
not compared
Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at kingdom level.
1 source · 1 record
Assefa D, Godbold DL, Belay B, Abiya A, Rewald B. 2018. Fine root morphology, biochemistry and litter quality indices of fast- and slow-growing woody species in Ethiopian highland forest. Ecosystems 21: 482-494.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/fred
Context: no place published · Jan. 1, 2014
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Jan. 1, 2014As published: 2014-01-01T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L24436107
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
Acompañantes documentados
This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.
Documented uses and recommendations
Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.
Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.