African Marigold (Tagetes erecta)

← Back to the species catalog

Identidad taxonómica

Scientific name: Tagetes erecta L.
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.: Tagetes erecta
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.: L.
Common names: African Marigold, Aztec marigold, American marigold, French marigold, Mexican Marigold, big marigold, marigold, saffron marigold, African Or French Marigold
Names in other languages (70)
Afrikanertjie, Aksamitka wzniesiona, Aufrechte Samtblume, Aufrechte Studentenblume, Ausgebreitete Studentenblume, Botâncă, Cempasúchil, Clavelitos de muerto, Cravo-de-defunto, Didysis serentis, French Marigold (EN); Clavelitos de muerto, Gold Talsyth, Groot afrikaantje, Kenikir, Nagy büdöske, Opret fløjlsblomst, Rose d'Inde, Ruda del pasto (ES); Ausgebreitete Studentenblume (DE); Pot Marigold, Stinking Suzy, Stor tagetes, Studentenblume, Susi (Trinidad & Tobago), Tagete eretta, Tagète dressé, Rose d'Inde, Tahi Kotok, Vạn thọ, aksamietnica vzpriamená, aksamitník rozkladitý, aksamitník vzpřímený, apátzicua, barchatcy prjamostojaš&ccaron;ie, barchatcy prjamostojaščie, caxyhuitz, cheonsugug, cravo-africano, flor de muerto, fløyelsblom, hohe Studentenblume, isosamettikukka, kadife çiçeği, kõrge peiulill, maravilha, masehual-xpuux, nagy bársonyvirág, oeillet d'Inde, senju-giku, sprikefløyelsblom, sprikjefløyelsblom, stort sammetsblomster, tagète rose d'Inde, wan shou ju, Œillet d'Inde, Œillet malbar, Œillet d'Inde, Бархатцы прямостоячие, Чорнобривці прямостійні, مخملية قائمة, झेंडू, బంతిపువ్వు, ചെണ്ടുമല്ലി, ดาวเรือง, ᱠᱩᱥᱩᱢᱵᱤ, アフリカンマリーゴールド, アフリカン・マリーゴールド, サンショウギク, センジュギク, 万寿菊, 千寿菊, 法國萬壽菊 (孔雀草), 萬壽菊, 천수국
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).: Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.: Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).: Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).: Asterales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).: Asteraceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.: Tagetes
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.: erecta
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.: species
Reference species: Tagetes erecta
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.: accepted name

Photos and conservation status

IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.: Not available.

No photos have been requested for this species yet.

Interacciones documentadas

GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.

A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.

Types shown: 10 of 10 is pollinated by × has its flowers visited by × is eaten by × is a host of × interacts with × is visited by × is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of × is adjacent to × has as a parasite × has as a pathogen ×

Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.

Pollination

is pollinated by 116 organisms

This term declares that the organism benefits this species. «Visits the flowers of» is a different term and a different block: a visitor is not a pollinator, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Black Masked Bee Hylaeus nigritus Colletidae	is pollinated by	3	no location
3 sources · 3 records Reji Chacko, M., Albouy, C., Altermatt, F., Brändle, M., Casanelles Abella, J., Boussange, V., Campell, F., Ellis, W. N., Fopp, F., Gossner, M. M., Ho., H., Joss, A., Kipf, P., Neff, F., Petrović, A., Prié, V., Tomanović, Ž., Zimmerli, N., Pellissier, L. (2024). trophiCH v1 - a … Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: no place published · no date published Westrich, P. (2023). Oligolektische Arten nach Pflanzenfamilien geordnet [Wildbienen: Grandiose Vielfalt]. https://www.wildbienen.info/bluetenbesuch/oligolektische_arten_nach_pflanzenfamilien.php Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Germany · Jan. 1, 2023 Krushelnycky, P. D. (2014). Evaluating the Interacting Influences of Pollination, Seed Predation, Invasive Species and Isolation on Reproductive Success in a Threatened Alpine Plant. PLOS ONE, 9(2), e88948. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088948 Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: USA · Jan. 1, 2014 · Visual observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Hawk's-beard Nomad Bee Nomada facilis Apidae	is pollinated by	2	no location
2 sources · 2 records Reji Chacko, M., Albouy, C., Altermatt, F., Brändle, M., Casanelles Abella, J., Boussange, V., Campell, F., Ellis, W. N., Fopp, F., Gossner, M. M., Ho., H., Joss, A., Kipf, P., Neff, F., Petrović, A., Prié, V., Tomanović, Ž., Zimmerli, N., Pellissier, L. (2024). trophiCH v1 - a … Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: no place published · no date published Rey, A., & Frey, D. (2022). Waldrand-Wespenbiene. Bee-Finder. https://www.bee-finder.ch/de/insekten/nomada-facilis/ Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Switzerland · Jan. 1, 2022 A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Two-banded Nomad Nomada bifasciata Apidae	is pollinated by	2	no location
2 sources · 2 records Reji Chacko, M., Albouy, C., Altermatt, F., Brändle, M., Casanelles Abella, J., Boussange, V., Campell, F., Ellis, W. N., Fopp, F., Gossner, M. M., Ho., H., Joss, A., Kipf, P., Neff, F., Petrović, A., Prié, V., Tomanović, Ž., Zimmerli, N., Pellissier, L. (2024). trophiCH v1 - a … Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: no place published · no date published Martin, H. (n.d.). Wespenbienen: Nomada bifasciata. Retrieved 1 May 2023, from https://www.wildbienen.de/eb-nbifa.htm Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Germany · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Grote bandgroefbij Lasioglossum majus Halictidae	is pollinated by	2	no location
2 sources · 2 records Reji Chacko, M., Albouy, C., Altermatt, F., Brändle, M., Casanelles Abella, J., Boussange, V., Campell, F., Ellis, W. N., Fopp, F., Gossner, M. M., Ho., H., Joss, A., Kipf, P., Neff, F., Petrović, A., Prié, V., Tomanović, Ž., Zimmerli, N., Pellissier, L. (2024). trophiCH v1 - a … Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: no place published · no date published CSCF. (2017). Info fauna \| Data Server. info fauna Nationales Daten- und Informationszentrum der Schweizer Fauna. https://lepus.infofauna.ch/tab/ Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Switzerland · Jan. 1, 2017 · Metaanalysis A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 116, by number of studies See more of this type

Flower visit

has its flowers visited by 110 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. Visiting a flower is not pollinating it. «Pollinates» is a different term and a different block, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Common Eastern Bumble Bee Bombus impatiens Apidae	has its flowers visited by	22	not compared
22 sources · 25 records https://www.bumblebeewatch.org/metadata/ Published in globalbioticinteractions/gbif-us-bees Record contexts (sample): no place published · Nov. 12, 2023 · Human observation; no place published · Nov. 3, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/4394867 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 19, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/309290769 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 26, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/320679364 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 9, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/321845892 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 18, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/323325722 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 26, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/33770372 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 2, 2019 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/34092186 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 8, 2019 · Human observation And 14 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Hunt Bumble Bee Bombus huntii Apidae	has its flowers visited by	11	not compared
11 sources · 11 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/32185649 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 4, 2019 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/60870578 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 26, 2020 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/179865098 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 23, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/70521651 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 8, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/70522048 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 8, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/70673384 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 8, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/70673385 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 8, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/70673386 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 8, 2017 · Human observation And 3 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Common Drone Fly Eristalis tenax Syrphidae	has its flowers visited by	11	not compared
11 sources · 11 records Ollerton, J., Trunschke, J. ., Havens, K. ., Landaverde-González, P. ., Keller, A. ., Gilpin, A.-M. ., Rodrigo Rech, A. ., Baronio, G. J. ., Phillips, B. J., Mackin, C. ., Stanley, D. A., Treanore, E. ., Baker, E. ., Rotheray, E. L., Erickson, E. ., Fornoff, F. ., Brearley, F. Q… Published in globalbioticinteractions/ollerton2022 Context: no place published · no date published https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/98541979 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 17, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/298905346 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 18, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/316231858 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 24, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/321845891 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 18, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/322422813 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 17, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/323325720 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 26, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/325327713 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 22, 2025 · Human observation And 3 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Black Swallowtail Papilio polyxenes Papilionidae	has its flowers visited by	10	not compared
10 sources · 10 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/297605791 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 11, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/297605804 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 12, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/307623834 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 18, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/8334507 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 25, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/10186118 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 25, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/320679369 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 12, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/28765294 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 13, 2019 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/28765305 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 13, 2019 · Human observation And 2 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 110, by number of studies See more of this type

is eaten by 46 organisms

This term does declare that the organism harms this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Woodland Skipper Ochlodes sylvanoides Hesperiidae	is eaten by	3	not compared
3 sources · 3 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/16179053 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 3, 2018 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/57277315 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 22, 2020 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/57792424 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 27, 2020 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Humming-bird Hawk-moth Macroglossum stellatarum Sphingidae	is eaten by	2	no location
2 sources · 2 records Reji Chacko, M., Albouy, C., Altermatt, F., Brändle, M., Casanelles Abella, J., Boussange, V., Campell, F., Ellis, W. N., Fopp, F., Gossner, M. M., Ho., H., Joss, A., Kipf, P., Neff, F., Petrović, A., Prié, V., Tomanović, Ž., Zimmerli, N., Pellissier, L. (2024). trophiCH v1 - a … Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: no place published · no date published Pearse, I. S., & Altermatt, F. (2013). Extinction cascades partially estimate herbivore losses in a complete Lepidoptera-plant food web. Ecology, 94(8), 1785–1794. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1075.1 Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Switzerland; Germany · Jan. 1, 2013 · Visual observation and existing literature A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Sage Skipper Muschampia proto Hesperiidae	is eaten by	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/314056520 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 13, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/316566679 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 24, 2025 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
European Peacock Aglais io Nymphalidae	is eaten by	2	no location
2 sources · 2 records Reji Chacko, M., Albouy, C., Altermatt, F., Brändle, M., Casanelles Abella, J., Boussange, V., Campell, F., Ellis, W. N., Fopp, F., Gossner, M. M., Ho., H., Joss, A., Kipf, P., Neff, F., Petrović, A., Prié, V., Tomanović, Ž., Zimmerli, N., Pellissier, L. (2024). trophiCH v1 - a … Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: no place published · no date published Pearse, I. S., & Altermatt, F. (2013). Extinction cascades partially estimate herbivore losses in a complete Lepidoptera-plant food web. Ecology, 94(8), 1785–1794. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1075.1 Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Switzerland; Germany · Jan. 1, 2013 · Visual observation and existing literature A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 46, by number of studies See more of this type

is a host of 25 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Puccinia tageticola Pucciniaceae	is a host of	21	not compared
21 sources · 22 records Stevenson, J.A.. 1975. Fungi of Puerto Rico and the American Virgin Islands. Contr. Reed Herb. 23:743 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Puerto Rico · no date published; Virgin Islands · no date published https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=904559 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Samana Peninsula, Samana Prov., Samana, near Los Cacaos · May 7, 1930 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=904560 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Valle del Cibao, Santiago Prov., Santiago Garden · March 7, 1931 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=904561 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Etla, Oaxaca · Nov. 16, 1903 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=1810128 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Medellin Ant. · Aug. 10, 1947 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=1810129 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Samana Peninsula, Samana Province, Samana, near Los Cacaos · July 5, 1930 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=1810130 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Cibao Valley, Santiago Province, Santiago town, in a garden · March 7, 1931 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=1810131 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Fredonia · Aug. 1, 1927 · Preserved specimen And 13 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Cercospora tageticola	is a host of	13	no location
13 sources · 15 records Ragazzi, A., and Marino, M.. 1990. II genere %Cercospora% in Africa, con particolare riferimento alla %Cercospora angolensis%. Riv. Agric. Subtrop. Trop. 84:171-184 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Sierra Leone · no date published; Mauritius · no date published https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=1345890 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Murshidabad, Balarampur · Jan. 30, 1967 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=1345891 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Pusa, Bihar · Dec. 9, 1933 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11216107 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Pusa, Bihar · Dec. 9, 1933 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2888218 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · no date published · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=3749217 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Pusa. · Dec. 9, 1933 · Preserved specimen Anonymous. 1960. Index of Plant Diseases in the United States. U.S.D.A. Agric. Handb. 165:1-531 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: United States · no date published Chupp, C.. 1954. Monograph of the fungus genus %Cercospora%. Published by the Author, Ithaca, New York :667 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: United States · no date published And 5 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Alternaria tagetica Pleosporaceae	is a host of	5	no location
5 sources · 5 records Cho, W.D., and Shin, H.D., Eds.. 2004. List of plant diseases in Korea. Fourth edition. Korean Society of Plant Pathology :779 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: Korea · no date published Mendes, M.A.S., da Silva, V.L., Dianese, J.C., and et al.. 1998. Fungos em Plants no Brasil. Embrapa-SPI/Embrapa-Cenargen, Brasilia :555 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: Brazil · no date published Yu, S.H.. 2001. Korean species of %Alternaria% and %Stemphylium%. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon, Korea :212 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: Korea · no date published Cotty, P.J.. 1986. %Alternaria tagetica% on marigold in New Jersey. Pl. Dis. 70:1159 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: United States · no date published Tomioka, K., Sato, T., and Koganezawa, H.. 2000. Marigold leaf spot caused by %Alternaria tagetica% new to Japan.. J. Gen. Pl. Pathol. 66:294-298 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: Japan · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Cercospora tagetea Mycosphaerellaceae	is a host of	4	no location
4 sources · 4 records Crous, P.W., and Braun, U.. 2003. %Mycosphaerella% and its anamorphs: 1. Names published in %Cercospora% and %Passalora%. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht :571 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: Dominican Republic · no date published Ciferri, R.. 1961. Mycoflora Domingensis Integrata.. Quaderno 19:1-539 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: Dominican Republic · no date published Phengsintham, P., Braun, U., McKenzie, E.H.C., Chukeatirote, E., Cai, L., and Hyde, K.D.. 2013. Monograph of Cercosporoid fungi from Thailand. Pl. Pathol & Quarantine 3(2):67-138 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: Thailand · no date published Ciferri, R.. 1954. Schedae Mycologicae XII-XXXIV. Sydowia 8:245-270 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: Dominican Republic · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 25, by number of studies See more of this type

interacts with 18 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Marigold Fruit Fly Trupanea vicina Tephritidae	interacts with	9	not compared
9 sources · 9 records urn:catalog:CAS:ENT:8325548 Published in globalbioticinteractions/cas-ent Context: Greenbrae- Eliseo drive at Sir Francis Drake blvd · no date published · Preserved specimen urn:catalog:CAS:ENT:8325549 Published in globalbioticinteractions/cas-ent Context: Greenbrae- Eliseo drive at Sir Francis Drake blvd · no date published · Preserved specimen urn:catalog:CAS:ENT:8325550 Published in globalbioticinteractions/cas-ent Context: Greenbrae- Eliseo drive at Sir Francis Drake blvd · no date published · Preserved specimen urn:catalog:CAS:ENT:8325551 Published in globalbioticinteractions/cas-ent Context: Greenbrae- Eliseo drive at Sir Francis Drake blvd · no date published · Preserved specimen urn:catalog:CAS:ENT:8325552 Published in globalbioticinteractions/cas-ent Context: Greenbrae- Eliseo drive at Sir Francis Drake blvd · no date published · Preserved specimen urn:catalog:CAS:ENT:8325553 Published in globalbioticinteractions/cas-ent Context: Greenbrae- Eliseo drive at Sir Francis Drake blvd · no date published · Preserved specimen urn:catalog:CAS:ENT:8325554 Published in globalbioticinteractions/cas-ent Context: Greenbrae- Eliseo drive at Sir Francis Drake blvd · no date published · Preserved specimen urn:catalog:CAS:ENT:8325555 Published in globalbioticinteractions/cas-ent Context: Greenbrae- Eliseo drive at Sir Francis Drake blvd · no date published · Preserved specimen And 1 more source, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Common thrip Neohydatothrips samayunkur Thripidae	interacts with	8	not compared
8 sources · 8 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/150699395 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 9, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152582699 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 27, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152796035 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 30, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152889448 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 30, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/153125297 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · April 2, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/160226442 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 7, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/166361058 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 9, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/196805456 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Jan. 16, 2024 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Common Carder Bee Bombus pascuorum Apidae	interacts with	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/307535684 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 19, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/58769788 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 6, 2020 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Locust Borer Megacyllene robiniae Cerambycidae	interacts with	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=41650081 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: Lexington · Oct. 2, 1914 · Preserved specimen https://ecdysis.org/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4255783 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ecdysis Context: Lexington · Oct. 2, 1914 · Preserved specimen A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 18, by number of studies See more of this type

is visited by 16 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Half-black Bumble Bee Bombus vagans Apidae	is visited by	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/131002125 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 10, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/131002488 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 10, 2022 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Tripartite Sweat Bee Halictus tripartitus Halictidae	is visited by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/233586948 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 3, 2024 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
European Peacock Aglais io Nymphalidae	is visited by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/319382946 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 7, 2025 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Cabbage Butterfly Pieris rapae Pieridae	is visited by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238918337 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 30, 2024 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 16, by number of studies See more of this type

is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of 4 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Pacispora scintillans Pacisporaceae	is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record S. Pehim Limbu, S.L. Stürmer, G. Zahn, C.A. Aguilar-Trigueros, N. Rogers, & V.B. Chaudhary, Climate-linked biogeography of mycorrhizal fungal spore traits, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (29) e2505059122, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2505059122 (2025). Accessed at <https://gi… Published in globalbioticinteractions/limbu2025 Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Scutellospora calospora Gigasporaceae	is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record S. Pehim Limbu, S.L. Stürmer, G. Zahn, C.A. Aguilar-Trigueros, N. Rogers, & V.B. Chaudhary, Climate-linked biogeography of mycorrhizal fungal spore traits, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (29) e2505059122, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2505059122 (2025). Accessed at <https://gi… Published in globalbioticinteractions/limbu2025 Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Glomus hoi Glomeraceae	is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record S. Pehim Limbu, S.L. Stürmer, G. Zahn, C.A. Aguilar-Trigueros, N. Rogers, & V.B. Chaudhary, Climate-linked biogeography of mycorrhizal fungal spore traits, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (29) e2505059122, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2505059122 (2025). Accessed at <https://gi… Published in globalbioticinteractions/limbu2025 Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Funneliformis mosseae Glomeraceae	is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record S. Pehim Limbu, S.L. Stürmer, G. Zahn, C.A. Aguilar-Trigueros, N. Rogers, & V.B. Chaudhary, Climate-linked biogeography of mycorrhizal fungal spore traits, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (29) e2505059122, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2505059122 (2025). Accessed at <https://gi… Published in globalbioticinteractions/limbu2025 Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 4, by number of studies

is adjacent to 1 organism

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Cercospora tageticola	is adjacent to	1	no location
1 source · 1 record https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=3749217 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Pusa. · Dec. 9, 1933 · Preserved specimen A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

has as a parasite 1 organism

This term does declare that the organism harms this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Parasitoid wasp Chrysocharis oscinidis Eulophidae	has as a parasite	1	no location
1 source · 1 record ChristPa987 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

has as a pathogen 1 organism

This term does declare that the organism harms this species. It is a narrow block, and it cannot be the only one that is read: the most frequent term in the catalogue is the one above, which declares no harm, so much of what a reader would call a pest arrives there instead.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Ageratum leaf curl betasatellite Tolecusatellitidae	has as a pathogen	1	no location
1 source · 1 record https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23636468 Published in globalbioticinteractions/virus-host-db Context: no place published · no date published · Literature, NCBI Virus, RefSeq A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

Interaction data from Global Biotic Interactions (GloBI), GloBI 0.11. Each row keeps the citation its own study published.

Interactions are published at species level: they are not resolved by variety or race.

Each block is headed by the source's own term, read from this species' end — not by a category of ours. Two similar terms are not merged.

«Documented here» means the interaction was observed in this territory. It is not evidence that the species is here, and it does not enter the niche model.

Acompañantes documentados

This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.

Documented uses and recommendations

Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.

Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.