Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L. — The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Plumeria rubra
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank. — The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
L.
Common names
Chelilairangebard, Frangipani, Mexican Plumeria, pagoda-tree, red paucipan, red-jasmine, templetree, frangipani pink, nosegay, red fragipani, red plumeNames in other languages (55)Alheli, Alheli roje, Amancayo, Angaiabe, Azuceno rojo, Cacalosúchil, Flor blanca, Flor de Mayo, Florón, Frangipani rosso, Frangipanier, Frangipanier blanc, Frangipanier rouge, Frangipanier rouge, Frangipanier blanc, Frangipanier rouge, Frangipán, Hint Mâbet Ağacı, Jasmim-manga, Kamboja Kubur, Kamboja Merah, Plumeria czerwona, Raudonasis jostras, Sacuanjoche, Uculhuitz, Vörös frangipáni, alhelí, alhelí cimarrón, cundá, flor-de-Santo-Antônio, frangipane, hong ji dan hua, jasmim-de-caiena, jasmim-do-Pará, jasmin-do-pará, jasmin-manga, pagoda tree, pluméria červená, rooifrangipani, rote Frangipani, rusotemppelipuu, suche, tipanie, árvore-pagode, Ινδικό φούλι, Плюмерия красная, Плюмерія червона, פלומריה ריחנית, चाफा, ลั่นทมแดง, インドソケイ, プルメリア, 紅雞蛋花, 红鸡蛋花, 红鸡蛋花*, 雞蛋花, 鸡蛋花
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi). — One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division. — Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida). — Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera). — Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Gentianales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family). — Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Apocynaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays. — Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Plumeria
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays. — The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
rubra
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies. — The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Reference species
Plumeria rubra
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful. — Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name
Photos and conservation status
IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area. — The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Not available.
No photos have been requested for this species yet.
Interacciones documentadas
GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.
A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.
Types shown: 4 of 4
is a host of
×
is eaten by
×
is adjacent to
×
interacts with
×
Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.
is a host of
35 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
Context: Intercepted at San Juan 12695 · Sept. 10, 1956 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Intercepted at San Juan 12695 · Sept. 10, 1956 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1956-09-10T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L16902984
Context: Colonia Limones, Soledad near Botanic Garden · Aug. 26, 1935 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Colonia Limones, Soledad near Botanic Garden · Aug. 26, 1935 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1935-08-26T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L16907194
Context: Intercepted at San Juan 14648 · May 28, 1960 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Intercepted at San Juan 14648 · May 28, 1960 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1960-05-28T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L16907195
Context: Intercepted at Miami 002863 · June 18, 1971 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Intercepted at Miami 002863 · June 18, 1971 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1971-06-18T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L16907196
Context: Intercepted at San Juan 14664 · June 18, 1960 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Intercepted at San Juan 14664 · June 18, 1960 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1960-06-18T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L16907197
Context: Patulul & San Lucus between · Jan. 26, 1907 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Patulul & San Lucus between · Jan. 26, 1907 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1907-01-26T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L17544158
Chupp, C.. 1954. Monograph of the fungus genus %Cercospora%. Published by the Author, Ithaca, New York :667
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: India · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
India · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4001215
No public URL for this record
Quimio, T.H., and Abilay, L.E.. 1977. Unreported species of %Cercospora% in the Philippines.. Nova Hedwigia 28:533-541
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Philippines · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Philippines · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4206587
No public URL for this record
Thaung, M.M.. 1984. Some fungi of %Cercospora% complex from Burma.. Mycotaxon 19:425-452
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Myanmar · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Myanmar · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4250549
No public URL for this record
Rubin, H.l.. 1965. %Cercospora plumeraie% Chupp - a new report for the United States. Pl. Dis. Reporter 49:729
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: United States · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
United States · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4338865
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
frangipani rustColeosporium plumeriae
is a host of
3
no location
3 sources · 4 records
Stevenson, J.A.. 1975. Fungi of Puerto Rico and the American Virgin Islands. Contr. Reed Herb. 23:743
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Record contexts (sample): Puerto Rico · no date published; Virgin Islands · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Puerto Rico · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3943408
Virgin Islands · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3943419
No public URL for this record
Minter, D.W., Rodriguez Hernandez, M., and Mena Portales, J.. 2001. Fungi of the Caribbean: an annotated checklist. PDMS Publishing :946
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: West Indies · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
West Indies · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3956757
No public URL for this record
Yan, J., Wu, P.-s., Shi, Z.-W., and Wu, Y. . 2006. A new record of %Coleosporium% (Uredinales) in China. Mycosystema 25:327-328
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: China · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
China · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4361644
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Mathur, R.S.. 1979. The Coelomycetes of India. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Delhi, India. :460
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: India · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
India · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3985308
No public URL for this record
Sarbhoy, A.K., and Agarwal, D.K.. 1990. Descriptions of Tropical Plant Pathogenic Fungi. Set 1.. Malhotra Publ. House, New Delhi :--
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: India · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
India · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4155773
No public URL for this record
Thaung, M.M.. 2008. Biodiversity survey of coelomycetes in Burma. Australas. Mycol. 27:74-110
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Myanmar · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Myanmar · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4202747
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
This term does declare that the organism harms this species.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Giant Gray SphinxPseudosphinx tetrioSphingidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Edward Baker; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Amoret Whitaker; Steen Dupont; Vincent Smith; John S Noyes (2017). NHM Interactions Bank. https://doi.org/10.5519/0060767. Accessed at <https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/82e807f0-6273-4f19-be0a-7f7558442a25/resource/f84ad9f1-bd0c-4811…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18750245
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Rustic SphinxManduca rusticaSphingidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Edward Baker; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Amoret Whitaker; Steen Dupont; Vincent Smith; John S Noyes (2017). NHM Interactions Bank. https://doi.org/10.5519/0060767. Accessed at <https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/82e807f0-6273-4f19-be0a-7f7558442a25/resource/f84ad9f1-bd0c-4811…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18751007
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Paliga machoeralisCrambidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Edward Baker; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Amoret Whitaker; Steen Dupont; Vincent Smith; John S Noyes (2017). NHM Interactions Bank. https://doi.org/10.5519/0060767. Accessed at <https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/82e807f0-6273-4f19-be0a-7f7558442a25/resource/f84ad9f1-bd0c-4811…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18744715
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Isognathus swainsoniSphingidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Edward Baker; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Amoret Whitaker; Steen Dupont; Vincent Smith; John S Noyes (2017). NHM Interactions Bank. https://doi.org/10.5519/0060767. Accessed at <https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/82e807f0-6273-4f19-be0a-7f7558442a25/resource/f84ad9f1-bd0c-4811…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18750012
Context: Hilo · July 15, 1991 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Hilo · July 15, 1991 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1991-07-15T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L16697005
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 2 of 2, by number of studies
interacts with
1 organism
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Cryptocephalus irroratusChrysomelidae
interacts with
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/88154684
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · July 22, 2021 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · July 22, 2021 · Human observationAs published: 2021-07-22T14:28:07Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5848046
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
Acompañantes documentados
This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.
Documented uses and recommendations
Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.
Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.
