Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album)

← Back to the species catalog

Identidad taxonómica

Scientific name: Chenopodium album L.
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.: Chenopodium album
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.: L.
Common names: Common Lambsquarters, Fat Hen, Fat-hen, Giant Fat-hen, Lambs Quarters, Lambsquarters, Lambsquarters Goosefoot, Pigweed, White Goosefoot, lamb's-quarters, lamb’s-quarters
Names in other languages (137)
Ackermelde, Ak kazayağı, Ancarinha-branca, Ağımtıl tərə, Baltoji balanda, Blet blanc, Blodau'r Domen, Borbas-Gänsefuß, Běła pólšica, Cenizo, Chenopode blanc, Chénopode blanc, Chénopode blanc, Senousse, Càl Slapach, Drageline, Díkʼǫ́ǫ́zhí yiltʼąąʼí, Farinello comune, Farinèl, Farinèla, Farinèle, Fariñento, Fariñón, Farnelo, Farnento, Fat-hen (EN); Cenizo blanco (ES), Fehér libatop, Gwydd-Droed Bwytadwy, Gwydd-Droed Gwyn, Gwydd-Droed Gwynaidd, Hvidmelet gåsefod, K'ita kinwa, Khuchi kinwa, Kinwilla, Komosa biała, Kuchi kinwa, Laba gastei, Llikcha, Lliqcha, Mayeule, Melganzenvoet, Melganzevoet, Pepeljuga, Poule-grasse, Sabi hostozuri, Saviheinä, Schissmelle, Senousse, Tafod yr Oen, Troed yr Wydd, Troed yr Wydd Gwynaidd, Troed-yr-Ŵydd Gwyn, Tłʼohdeeítsoh, Valge hanemalts, Weisser Gaensefuss, Weisser Gänsefuss, Weißer Gänsefuß (Artengruppe), Weißer Gänsefuß (DE); Lamb's Quarters, Withondebossie, ajea, altos, anserina-branca, ansérine blanche, ançarinha-branca, armuelle, armuelle borde, armuelle silvestre, armuelles bordes, armuelles silvestres, bela metlika, berza de perros, berza perruna, bledo, bledos, bledos pestosos, bletos, burriquesos, cagadós, cañizo, cedijo, cenicera, cenilgo, ceniso, cenizo blanco, cenizo común, cenizo verde, cenizos, ceñidros, ceñiglo, ceñiglo blanco, ceñiglo verde, ceñiglos, ceñigo, ceñilgo, ceñilgos, ceñilos, ceñisgo, chamarisco, chinizo, chou gras, cimielga, cincho, cisno, ciñidro, ciñilgos, ciñilos, ciñiplu, ciñublo, dançarina-branca, desajo, engordagochos, erva-de-são-joão, erva-formigueira-branca, falsa-erva-de-Santa-Maria, fedegosa, fenifo, fenijo, flor de la sardina, formigueira-branca, gajo, genifro, genijo, genillo, hagea lebrel, hierba cana, hvid melde, iwa-akaza, jajo, jajo caballar, jajo rastrero, jauhosavikka, jenijo, jáffolasta, lamb's quarters, ledo blanco, li, mata sucia, medlestokk
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).: Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.: Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).: Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).: Caryophyllales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).: Amaranthaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.: Chenopodium
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.: album
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.: species
Reference species: Chenopodium album
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.: accepted name

Photos and conservation status

IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.: Not evaluated (NE)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-09 15:21.

Photo of Chenopodium album L. — Photo: nebrooks · CC BY 4.0 · View original image · Original observation

Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-09 15:21.

Interacciones documentadas

GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.

A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.

Types shown: 12 of 15 is eaten by × interacts with (this species is the record's destination) × is a host of × interacts with (this species is the record's origin) × is visited by × is adjacent to × has as a parasite × is pollinated by × has its flowers visited by × is a mutualist of × co-occurs ecologically with × is a parasite of × 3 more types with data for this species

Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.

is eaten by 234 organisms

This term does declare that the organism harms this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Lesser Goldfinch Spinus psaltria Fringillidae	is eaten by	23	not compared
23 sources · 23 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/133996088 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 7, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/142334137 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 18, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/142571477 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 21, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/142645446 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 22, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/144510678 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 16, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/145315699 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 28, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/145383894 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 29, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/145383899 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 29, 2022 · Human observation And 15 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
House Finch Haemorhous mexicanus Fringillidae	is eaten by	15	not compared
15 sources · 15 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/144827753 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 21, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/144827757 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 21, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/145159315 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 25, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/145159316 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 25, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/145315710 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 27, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/145315715 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 27, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/145383892 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 29, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/146011770 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Jan. 7, 2023 · Human observation And 7 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Black Bean Aphid Aphis fabae Aphididae	is eaten by	8	no location
8 sources · 8 records Poelen, J. H. Global Biotic Interactions: Interpreted Data Products. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5708970 (2021). Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Global · Jan. 1, 2021 · Metaanalysis Reji Chacko, M., Albouy, C., Altermatt, F., Brändle, M., Casanelles Abella, J., Boussange, V., Campell, F., Ellis, W. N., Fopp, F., Gossner, M. M., Ho., H., Joss, A., Kipf, P., Neff, F., Petrović, A., Prié, V., Tomanović, Ž., Zimmerli, N., Pellissier, L. (2024). trophiCH v1 - a … Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: no place published · no date published Ellis, W. N. (2022). Plant Parasites of Europe – leafminers, galls and fungi [Database]. https://bladmineerders.nl/ Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Europe · Jan. 1, 2022 Neff, F., Brändle, M., Ambarli, D., Ammer, C., Bauhus, J., Boch, S., Hölzel, N., Klaus, V. H., Kleinebecker, T., Prati, D., Schall, P., Schäfer, D., Schulze, E. D., Seibold, S., Simons, N. K., Weisser, W. W., Pellissier, L., & Gossner, M. M. (2021). Changes in plant-herbivore ne… Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Germany · Jan. 1, 2021 · Visual observation Lampel, G., & Meier, W. (2003). Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha—Aphidina Teil 2. In Hemiptera Sternorrhyncha—Aphidina. Centre suisse de cartographie de la faune. Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Switzerland · Jan. 1, 2005 Starý, P. (2006). Aphid parasitoids of the Czech Republic (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae). Academia. Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Czech Republic · Jan. 1, 2006 · Visual observation Vorburger, C., Herzog, J., & Rouchet, R. (2017). Data from: Aphid specialization on different summer hosts is associated with strong genetic differentiation and unequal symbiont communities despite a common mating habitat (Version 1, p. 147574 bytes) [Dataset]. Dryad. https://do… Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Switzerland; France · Jan. 1, 2017 · DNA metabarcoding Vorburger, C., & Rouchet, R. (2016). Data from: Are aphid parasitoids locally adapted to the prevalence of defensive symbionts in their hosts? (Version 1, p. 255724 bytes) [Dataset]. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/DRYAD.F8F8H Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Switzerland; France · Jan. 1, 2016 · DNA metabarcoding A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Painted Lady Vanessa cardui	is eaten by	6	not compared
6 sources · 6 records Brian G. Scholtens (Expert) Published in globalbioticinteractions/hale2024 Context: no place published · no date published Kayla R. S. Hale (Expert) Published in globalbioticinteractions/hale2024 Context: no place published · no date published Jordon Tourville (Expert) Published in globalbioticinteractions/hale2024 Context: no place published · no date published Edward Baker; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Amoret Whitaker; Steen Dupont; Vincent Smith; John S Noyes (2017). NHM Interactions Bank. https://doi.org/10.5519/0060767. Accessed at <https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/82e807f0-6273-4f19-be0a-7f7558442a25/resource/f84ad9f1-bd0c-4811… Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published Robinson, G.S., Ackery, P.R., Kitching, I.J., Beccaloni, G.W., Hernández, L.M. (2010) HOSTS-A database of the world's lepidopteran hostplants. Natural History Museum, London. Published in globalbioticinteractions/delrisco2021 Context: Bogotá, Colombia · no date published Poelen, J. H. Global Biotic Interactions: Interpreted Data Products. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5708970 (2021). Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Global · Jan. 1, 2021 · Metaanalysis A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 234, by number of studies See more of this type

interacts with 188 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Six-spot Neb Chrysoesthia sexguttella Gelechiidae	interacts with	157	not compared
157 sources · 180 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/304222346 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · Aug. 2, 2025 · Human observation; no place published · Aug. 2, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/307623055 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · Aug. 19, 2025 · Human observation; no place published · Aug. 19, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/218801013 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · May 27, 2024 · Human observation; no place published · May 27, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/222166141 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · June 11, 2024 · Human observation; no place published · June 11, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/124351509 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · July 2, 2022 · Human observation; no place published · July 2, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/228045232 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · July 8, 2024 · Human observation; no place published · July 8, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/128124845 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · July 25, 2022 · Human observation; no place published · July 25, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/31702047 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · Aug. 28, 2019 · Human observation; no place published · Aug. 28, 2019 · Human observation And 149 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Norvellina chenopodii Cicadellidae	interacts with	25	not compared
25 sources · 25 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/302079195 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 14, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/109083277 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 6, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/218554632 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 26, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/219147822 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 28, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/221560667 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 1, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/222980983 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 15, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/122385820 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 18, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/123803920 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 20, 2022 · Human observation And 17 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Common Lamb's-quarters Chenopodium album Amaranthaceae	interacts with	14	not compared
14 sources · 14 records http://bins.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=FCA1627-11 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bold Context: Rankin Inlet, N.W.T. District of Keewatin. Rankin Inlet. Kudluli · Aug. 16, 1971 · Material sample http://bins.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=HIMS2268-12 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bold Context: R.R.Tracks between Glasgow St. & Yorkshire St. · Nov. 7, 2012 · Material sample http://bins.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=KSR261-07 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bold Context: Regional Municipality of York, King Twp., Jokers Hill West., NW end of plowed area N of E-po · Aug. 28, 2006 · Material sample http://bins.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=MKPCH659-10 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bold Context: Churchill, unspecified locality · Aug. 1, 1985 · Material sample http://bins.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=PLNIA023-08 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bold Context: Niagara County, Niagara-on-the-Lake Township, Fields around Traveller`s Stop at intersection of · Nov. 29, 2006 · Material sample http://bins.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=PLNOR091-08 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bold Context: Norfolk County, Delhi Twp., Vittoria Conservation Area, Picnic Area, stream an · July 18, 2007 · Material sample http://bins.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=PLWEL013-08 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bold Context: Wellington County, City of Guelph, OAC Herbarium and BIO Grounds · Sept. 19, 2006 · Material sample http://bins.boldsystems.org/index.php/Public_RecordView?processid=RRPLA067-15 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bold Context: rare Charitable Research Reserve, Blair Flats · Aug. 12, 2015 · Material sample And 6 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Common Sootywing Pholisora catullus Hesperiidae	interacts with	11	not compared
11 sources · 11 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/296558270 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 9, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/304163541 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 6, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/16284118 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 7, 2018 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/29411479 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 23, 2019 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/138404892 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 10, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/32129883 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 4, 2019 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/165388410 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 3, 2023 · Human observation https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=37505354 Published in globalbioticinteractions/msu-msuc Context: Michigan State University campus, Entomology Farm, Collins Rd. · Aug. 17, 2018 · Preserved specimen And 3 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 188, by number of studies See more of this type

is a host of 171 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Beet Downy Mildew Peronospora effusa Peronosporaceae	is a host of	343	not compared
343 sources · 349 records Anonymous. 1960. Index of Plant Diseases in the United States. U.S.D.A. Agric. Handb. 165:1-531 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): United States · no date published; United States · no date published https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11588811 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Winnipeg, Manitoba Agricultural College · July 5, 1925 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11601846 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Glen Ewen · Aug. 11, 1931 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11645024 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Woods Holl · Aug. 1, 1881 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=14690985 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Syracuse · July 9, 1892 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=14690959 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Ann Arbor · July 14, 1892 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=14692896 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Leamington · Sept. 1, 1892 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=14696372 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Alcove · July 19, 1893 · Preserved specimen And 335 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Cercospora dubia Mycosphaerellaceae	is a host of	263	not compared
263 sources · 266 records Anonymous. 1960. Index of Plant Diseases in the United States. U.S.D.A. Agric. Handb. 165:1-531 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): United States · no date published; United States · no date published Shaw, C.G.. 1973. Host fungus index for the Pacific Northwest - I. Hosts. Washington State Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 765:1-121 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): United States · no date published; United States · no date published https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11681247 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Kentville · Aug. 16, 1951 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11681248 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: near Maple · Aug. 24, 1941 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11681249 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Ottawa, Highland Park area · Aug. 19, 1945 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11593803 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Winnipeg, e. Manitoba Agricultural College · Sept. 1, 1926 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11681250 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Winnipeg, University of Manitoba, as Manitoba Agricultural College · Aug. 22, 1927 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11593780 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Winnipeg, e. Manitoba Agricultural College · July 29, 1927 · Preserved specimen And 255 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Beet Downy Mildew Peronospora farinosa Peronosporaceae	is a host of	248	not compared
248 sources · 294 records Choi, Y.-J. , Danielsen, S., Lubeck, M., Hong, S.-B., Delhey, R., and Shin, H.-D.. 2010. Morphological and molecular characterization of the causal agent of downy mildew on quinoa (%Chenopodium quinoa%). Mycopathologia 169:403-412 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Germany · no date published; Ireland · no date published Choi, Y.-J. , Denchev, C.M., and Shin, H.D.. 2008. Morphological and Molecular Analyses Support the Existence of Host-specific %Peronospora% Species Infecting %Chenopodium%. Mycopathologia 165:155-164 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Korea · no date published; Netherlands · no date published Anonymous. 1960. Index of Plant Diseases in the United States. U.S.D.A. Agric. Handb. 165:1-531 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): United States · no date published; United States · no date published Farr, David F.; Rossman, Amy Y.; Castlebury, Lisa A. (2021). United States National Fungus Collections Fungus-Host Dataset. Ag Data Commons. https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/1524414. Accessed at <https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host/archive/47a3882c0c536… Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Poland · no date published; Japan · no date published Francis, S., and Waterhouse, G.. 1988. List of Peronosporaceae reported from the British Isles. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 91:1-62 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Ireland · no date published; Scotland · no date published Shaw, C.G.. 1973. Host fungus index for the Pacific Northwest - I. Hosts. Washington State Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 765:1-121 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): United States · no date published; United States · no date published Gustavsson, A.. 1991. The genus %Peronospora% in the Iberian Peninsula, especially in Northern Spain and Andorra. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 49:1-38 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Andorra · no date published; Spain · no date published Constantinescu, O.. 1991. An annotated list of %Peronospora% names.. Thunbergia 15:1-110 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): USSR · no date published; Germany · no date published And 240 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Passalora dubia Mycosphaerellaceae	is a host of	100	not compared
100 sources · 103 records Knight, N.L., Vaghefi, N., Kikkert, J.R., and Pethybridge, S.J.. 2019. Alternative hosts of %Cercospora beticola% in field surveys and inoculation trials. Pl. Dis. 103(8):1983-1990 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Iran · no date published; United States · no date published Crous, P.W., and Braun, U.. 1996. Cercosporoid fungi from South Africa.. Mycotaxon 57:233-321 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): South Africa · no date published; South Africa · no date published https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11767320 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Davis Bros. Farm · Sept. 2, 1946 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11767321 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Bradford, Holland R. Marsh · Aug. 7, 1930 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11767322 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: "Springwater", south of Orwell · Aug. 22, 1946 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11680971 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: at or near London · no date published · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11680972 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Riga · Jan. 1, 1933 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11680973 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Windsor Locks · Aug. 6, 1910 · Preserved specimen And 92 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 171, by number of studies See more of this type

interacts with 43 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Prickly Lettuce Lactuca serriola Asteraceae	interacts with	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://cch2.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=5860373 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ucsb-cch Context: Ventura Land Trust Hayden Preserve. North side of Cañada Larga Road just east of Hwy 33. Eastern part of the preserve near large oak tree a… https://cch2.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=5979445 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ucsb-cch Context: Ventura Land Trust Hayden Preserve; North side of Cañada Larga Road just east of Hwy 33; Eastern part of reserve, near large oak tree and n… A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
oats Avena Poaceae	interacts with	2	not compared	Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at genus level.
2 sources · 2 records https://cch2.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=5860373 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ucsb-cch Context: Ventura Land Trust Hayden Preserve. North side of Cañada Larga Road just east of Hwy 33. Eastern part of the preserve near large oak tree a… https://cch2.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=5979445 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ucsb-cch Context: Ventura Land Trust Hayden Preserve; North side of Cañada Larga Road just east of Hwy 33; Eastern part of reserve, near large oak tree and n… A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Hirschfeldia incana Brassicaceae	interacts with	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://cch2.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=5860373 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ucsb-cch Context: Ventura Land Trust Hayden Preserve. North side of Cañada Larga Road just east of Hwy 33. Eastern part of the preserve near large oak tree a… https://cch2.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=5979445 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ucsb-cch Context: Ventura Land Trust Hayden Preserve; North side of Cañada Larga Road just east of Hwy 33; Eastern part of reserve, near large oak tree and n… A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Bread Wheat Triticum aestivum Poaceae	interacts with	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records Athanassova, D.P. (1997) Allelochemicals from Chenopodium album L. embryos and their effect on weeds and crop plants. Journal of Allelopathy 2, 189-196. Published in globalbioticinteractions/delrisco2021 Context: Bogotá, Colombia · no date published https://biorepo.neonscience.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=872579 Published in globalbioticinteractions/neon-biorepo Context: Domain 10, North Sterling, NEON Plot STER_013 · July 25, 2019 · Preserved specimen A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 43, by number of studies See more of this type

is visited by 25 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Chenopodium Aphid Hayhurstia atriplicis Aphididae	is visited by	4	not compared
4 sources · 4 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/297979335 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 14, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/326263474 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 12, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/58099115 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 29, 2020 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/181423508 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 2, 2023 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Six-spot Neb Chrysoesthia sexguttella Gelechiidae	is visited by	4	not compared
4 sources · 4 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/15447805 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 14, 2018 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/134724386 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 11, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/136490654 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 25, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/244712611 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 29, 2024 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Small Tortoise Beetle Cassida piperata Chrysomelidae	is visited by	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/295653884 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 5, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/300113702 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 21, 2025 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Beet Downy Mildew Peronospora farinosa Peronosporaceae	is visited by	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/137862257 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 7, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/162822662 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 20, 2023 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 25, by number of studies See more of this type

is adjacent to 22 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Cercospora dubia Mycosphaerellaceae	is adjacent to	51	not compared
51 sources · 51 records https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2756883 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: London · Sept. 1, 1896 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2756884 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Fromberg · Sept. 10, 1913 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2756886 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Ithaca · Sept. 27, 1912 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=3575560 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: London · Sept. 1, 1896 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=5180171 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Königstein · Sept. 1, 1893 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4704301 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · Sept. 1, 1896 · Exsiccati https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4818725 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · Sept. 27, 1912 · Exsiccati https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4819262 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · Sept. 10, 1913 · Exsiccati And 43 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Beet Downy Mildew Peronospora effusa Peronosporaceae	is adjacent to	26	not compared
26 sources · 26 records https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4364586 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Newton · no date published · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=3772148 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · Sept. 1, 1892 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=3772155 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Stockton · May 23, 1905 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2642320 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Camp Point · no date published · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4350484 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · June 26, 1882 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4352835 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Ann Arbor · July 1, 1894 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4353571 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Beaver Creek Camp, Little Beaver, Tributaries of South For Cache La Poudre River · July 10, 1896 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4353573 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · July 3, 1902 · Preserved specimen And 18 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Beet Downy Mildew Peronospora farinosa Peronosporaceae	is adjacent to	16	not compared
16 sources · 16 records 16336e68-e943-4a69-b083-e2e66b22acd4 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fmnh Context: Forbach, field by Mont Sainte-Croix [Acker am Kreuzberg] · July 4, 1913 · Preserved specimen c7a043bc-7349-4891-98f3-6095d264e32e Published in globalbioticinteractions/fmnh Context: Forbach, field by Mont Sainte-Croix [Acker am Kreuzberg] · July 4, 1913 · Preserved specimen 2213489f-4e53-4b26-a4b8-750c14288303 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fmnh Context: Forbach, field by Mont Sainte-Croix [Acker am Kreuzberg] · July 4, 1913 · Preserved specimen a99381f3-0022-4682-bd9a-2c36233bd8cf Published in globalbioticinteractions/fmnh Context: Forbach, field by Mont Sainte-Croix [Acker am Kreuzberg] · July 4, 1913 · Preserved specimen ac00aada-6a77-4887-a280-ca5008d0aabc Published in globalbioticinteractions/fmnh Context: Forbach, field by Mont Sainte-Croix [Acker am Kreuzberg] · July 4, 1913 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2326155 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Walton · July 11, 1923 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2865943 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: near Freeville · Aug. 17, 1904 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=3922166 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Ann Arbor · June 30, 1917 · Preserved specimen And 8 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Passalora dubia Mycosphaerellaceae	is adjacent to	7	not compared
7 sources · 7 records https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2756846 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Kulm · Sept. 10, 1911 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=3570617 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Windsor Locks; 41.929264 -72.627312 · Aug. 6, 1910 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=5180112 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Wilmersdorfer · July 1, 1885 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=3979714 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · July 1, 1917 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2627685 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Columbia · June 1, 1887 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2627635 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Windsor Locks · Aug. 6, 1910 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2627713 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Kulm · Sept. 10, 1911 · Preserved specimen A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 22, by number of studies See more of this type

has as a parasite 20 organisms

This term does declare that the organism harms this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Asecodes erxias Eulophidae	has as a parasite	2	no location
2 sources · 2 records PricopCaCi2012 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published Szelen964 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Pnigalio soemius Eulophidae	has as a parasite	2	no location
2 sources · 2 records Hansso987 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published Triggi978 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Anaphes iole Mymaridae	has as a parasite	2	no location
2 sources · 2 records JacksoGr983 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published GordonElFa987 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Tamarixia bicolor Eulophidae	has as a parasite	2	no location
2 sources · 2 records Graham991c via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published ZuparkQuLa2011 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 20, by number of studies See more of this type

Pollination

is pollinated by 9 organisms

This term declares that the organism benefits this species. «Visits the flowers of» is a different term and a different block: a visitor is not a pollinator, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Small Copper Lycaena phlaeas Lycaenidae	is pollinated by	1	no location
1 source · 1 record Poelen, J. H. Global Biotic Interactions: Interpreted Data Products. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5708970 (2021). Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: Global · Jan. 1, 2021 · Metaanalysis A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Black-tailed Aphideater Eupeodes luniger Syrphidae	is pollinated by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.806615 Published in JoseBSL/EuPPollNet Context: East Leinster (Ireland) · Aug. 5, 2018 · Transect A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Common Flower Fly Syrphus ribesii Syrphidae	is pollinated by	1	no location
1 source · 1 record Balfour, N. J., Castellanos, M. C., Goulson, D., Philippides, A., & Johnson, C. (2022). DoPI: The Database of Pollinator Interactions. Ecology, 103(11), e3801. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3801 Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: United Kingdom · Jan. 1, 2022 · Metaanalysis A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Marmalade Hoverfly Episyrphus balteatus Syrphidae	is pollinated by	1	no location
1 source · 1 record Balfour, N. J., Castellanos, M. C., Goulson, D., Philippides, A., & Johnson, C. (2022). DoPI: The Database of Pollinator Interactions. Ecology, 103(11), e3801. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3801 Published in globalbioticinteractions/trophiCH Context: United Kingdom · Jan. 1, 2022 · Metaanalysis A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 9, by number of studies See more of this type

Flower visit

has its flowers visited by 8 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. Visiting a flower is not pollinating it. «Pollinates» is a different term and a different block, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Common Flower Fly Syrphus ribesii Syrphidae	has its flowers visited by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record G.N. Stone et al., 2017. Dataset: Insect Pollinators Archive. Natural History Museum Data Portal (data.nhm.ac.uk). NHM Portal, doi:10.5519/0062900 Published in globalbioticinteractions/dopi Context: no place published · Jan. 1, 2011 · DO A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Peck's Skipper Polites peckius Hesperiidae	has its flowers visited by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/134923774 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 13, 2022 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
European Paper Wasp Polistes dominula Eumenidae	has its flowers visited by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/222964851 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 15, 2024 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Stenoria analis Meloidae	has its flowers visited by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/242948557 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 17, 2024 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 8, by number of studies See more of this type

is a mutualist of 4 organisms

This term declares that the organism benefits this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Incomplete Sweat Bee Lasioglossum incompletum Halictidae	is a mutualist of	1	no location
1 source · 4 records @article{Ponisio_2017,doi = {10.1111/ele.12821},url = {https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fele.12821},year = 2017,month = {sep},publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},volume = {20},number = {10},pages = {1261--1272},author = {Lauren C. Ponisio and Marilia P. Gaiarsa and Claire Kremen},editor = {Do… Published in globalbioticinteractions/mangal Record contexts (sample): no place published · Jan. 1, 2010 · field capture; no place published · Jan. 1, 2010 · field capture A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Margined Calligrapher Toxomerus marginatus Syrphidae	is a mutualist of	1	no location
1 source · 2 records @article{Ponisio_2017,doi = {10.1111/ele.12821},url = {https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fele.12821},year = 2017,month = {sep},publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},volume = {20},number = {10},pages = {1261--1272},author = {Lauren C. Ponisio and Marilia P. Gaiarsa and Claire Kremen},editor = {Do… Published in globalbioticinteractions/mangal Record contexts (sample): no place published · Jan. 1, 2010 · field capture; no place published · Jan. 1, 2010 · field capture A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Lasioglossum diversopunctatum Halictidae	is a mutualist of	1	no location
1 source · 3 records @article{Ponisio_2017,doi = {10.1111/ele.12821},url = {https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fele.12821},year = 2017,month = {sep},publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},volume = {20},number = {10},pages = {1261--1272},author = {Lauren C. Ponisio and Marilia P. Gaiarsa and Claire Kremen},editor = {Do… Published in globalbioticinteractions/mangal Record contexts (sample): no place published · Jan. 1, 2013 · field capture; no place published · Jan. 1, 2013 · field capture A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Exotic Streaktail Allograpta exotica Syrphidae	is a mutualist of	1	no location
1 source · 1 record @article{Ponisio_2017,doi = {10.1111/ele.12821},url = {https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fele.12821},year = 2017,month = {sep},publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},volume = {20},number = {10},pages = {1261--1272},author = {Lauren C. Ponisio and Marilia P. Gaiarsa and Claire Kremen},editor = {Do… Published in globalbioticinteractions/mangal Context: no place published · Jan. 1, 2007 · field capture A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 4, by number of studies

co-occurs ecologically with 2 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Painted Lady Vanessa cardui	co-occurs ecologically with	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record Robinson, G.S., Ackery, P.R., Kitching, I.J., Beccaloni, G.W., Hernández, L.M. (2010) HOSTS-A database of the world's lepidopteran hostplants. Natural History Museum, London. Published in globalbioticinteractions/delrisco2021 Context: Bogotá, Colombia · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Dark Sword-grass Agrotis ipsilon Noctuidae	co-occurs ecologically with	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record Robinson, G.S., Ackery, P.R., Kitching, I.J., Beccaloni, G.W., Hernández, L.M. (2010) HOSTS-A database of the world's lepidopteran hostplants. Natural History Museum, London. Published in globalbioticinteractions/delrisco2021 Context: Bogotá, Colombia · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 2 of 2, by number of studies

is a parasite of 1 organism

This term declares that the organism benefits this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Puccinia aff. coronata ML-2011 Pucciniaceae	is a parasite of	1	no location	Not a modelling unit: the source did not resolve a species — the name carries an open-nomenclature qualifier.
1 source · 1 record Vanderweyen A & Fraiture A (2009) Catalogue des Uredinales de Belgique, 1re partie, Chaconiaceae, Coleosporiaceae, Cronartiaceae, Melampsoraceae, Phragmidiaceae, Pucciniastraceae, Raveneliaceae et Uropyxidaceae. Lejeunia, Revue de Botanique. Page: 11 Published in globalbioticinteractions/uredinales-belgium-checklist Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

Interaction data from Global Biotic Interactions (GloBI), GloBI 0.11. Each row keeps the citation its own study published.

Interactions are published at species level: they are not resolved by variety or race.

Each block is headed by the source's own term, read from this species' end — not by a category of ours. Two similar terms are not merged.

«Documented here» means the interaction was observed in this territory. It is not evidence that the species is here, and it does not enter the niche model.

Acompañantes documentados

This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.

Documented uses and recommendations

Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.

Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.