Green Soft-scale (Coccus viridis)

← Back to the species catalog

Identidad taxonómica

Scientific name: Coccus viridis (Green, 1889)
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.: Coccus viridis
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.: (Green, 1889)
Common names: Green Soft-scale, Green scale, green coffee scale
Names in other languages (10)
Cochenille verte du caféier, Groene koffiedopluis, Groene koffieluis, Grüne Kaffeeschildlaus, cochinilla verde del café, cochonilha-verde, escama verde, groene dopluis, lapa-verde, midori-kata-kaigaramushi
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).: Animalia
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.: Arthropoda
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).: Insecta
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).: Hemiptera
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).: Coccidae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.: Coccus
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.: viridis
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.: species
Reference species: Coccus viridis
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.: accepted name

Photos and conservation status

IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.: Not evaluated (NE)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-22 09:49.

Photo of Coccus viridis (Green, 1889) — Photo: monkeyjodey · CC0 1.0 · View original image · Original observation

Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-22 09:49.

Interacciones documentadas

GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.

A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.

Types shown: 4 of 4 interacts with × has as a host × is adjacent to × eats ×

Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.

interacts with 3 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Sour orange Citrus × aurantium Rutaceae	interacts with	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/336501667 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Jan. 1, 2026 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/160496480 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 11, 2022 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Mandarin Orange Citrus reticulata Rutaceae	interacts with	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/333121920 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Jan. 2, 2026 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Day jessamine Cestrum nocturnum Solanaceae	interacts with	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/7541671 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 1, 2017 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 3 of 3, by number of studies

has as a host 2 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Arabica Coffee Coffea arabica Rubiaceae	has as a host	1	no location
1 source · 1 record http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/341870399 Published in millerse/Wardeh-et-al.-2015 Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Sour orange Citrus aurantium Rutaceae	has as a host	1	no location
1 source · 1 record http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/341870373 Published in millerse/Wardeh-et-al.-2015 Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 2 of 2, by number of studies

is adjacent to 1 organism

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Sour orange Citrus aurantium Rutaceae	is adjacent to	4	no location
4 sources · 4 records https://ecdysis.org/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4955524 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ecdysis Context: Aitutaki, Arutanga Nono Nikodema's orchard · Oct. 27, 1975 · Preserved specimen https://ecdysis.org/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4955530 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ecdysis Context: Aitutaki, Arutange Nono Nikodema's Orchard · Oct. 27, 1975 · Preserved specimen https://ecdysis.org/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4955531 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ecdysis Context: Aitutaki, Arutange Nono Nikodema's Orchard · Oct. 27, 1975 · Preserved specimen https://ecdysis.org/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4955532 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ecdysis Context: Aitutaki, Arutange Nono Nikodema's Orchard · Oct. 27, 1975 · Preserved specimen A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

eats 1 organism

This term declares that the organism benefits this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Liberian Coffee Coffea liberica Rubiaceae	eats	1	no location
1 source · 4 records Humber, R.A. 1992. Collection of entomopathogenic fungal cultures: catolog of strains, 1992. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service. ARS-110. 177pp. (Plant Protection Research Unit, U.S. Plant, Soil, and Water Laboratory, Tower Rd., Ithaca, N. Y. 14853-0331… Published in millerse/Ecological-Database-of-the-World-s-Insect-Pathogens Record contexts (sample): Sri Lanka · no date published; India · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

Interaction data from Global Biotic Interactions (GloBI), GloBI 0.11. Each row keeps the citation its own study published.

Interactions are published at species level: they are not resolved by variety or race.

Each block is headed by the source's own term, read from this species' end — not by a category of ours. Two similar terms are not merged.

«Documented here» means the interaction was observed in this territory. It is not evidence that the species is here, and it does not enter the niche model.

Acompañantes documentados

This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.

Documented uses and recommendations

Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.

Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.