Casearia icosandra (Sw.) Planch. & Triana ex Hemsl.
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L. — The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Casearia icosandra
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank. — The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
(Sw.) Planch. & Triana ex Hemsl.
Common names
Names in other languages (4)Cachiman sauvage (Haiti), Cuffey wood (Jamaica), Quinam Sardine, Sardine (Trinidad & Tobago); Cachiman marron
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi). — One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division. — Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida). — Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera). — Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Malpighiales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family). — Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Salicaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays. — Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Casearia
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays. — The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
icosandra
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies. — The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful. — Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name
Photos and conservation status
IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area. — The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Not evaluated (NE)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-13 10:54.
Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-13 10:54.
Interacciones documentadas
GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.
A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.
Types shown: 3 of 3
is a host of
×
is eaten by
×
is preyed upon by
×
Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.
is a host of
4 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Siderone marthesia
is a host of
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Gaden S. Robinson; Phillip R. Ackery; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Luis M. Hernández (2023). HOSTS (from HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants) [Data set resource]. Natural History Museum. https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/hosts/resource/877f387a-36a3-486c-…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/HOSTS
Context: Costa Rica · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Costa Rica · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6622611
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Hylesia lineataSaturniidae
is a host of
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Gaden S. Robinson; Phillip R. Ackery; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Luis M. Hernández (2023). HOSTS (from HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants) [Data set resource]. Natural History Museum. https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/hosts/resource/877f387a-36a3-486c-…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/HOSTS
Context: Neotropical · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Neotropical · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6594922
Gaden S. Robinson; Phillip R. Ackery; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Luis M. Hernández (2023). HOSTS (from HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants) [Data set resource]. Natural History Museum. https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/hosts/resource/877f387a-36a3-486c-…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/HOSTS
Context: Neotropical · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Neotropical · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6594336
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Automeris rubrescens
is a host of
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Gaden S. Robinson; Phillip R. Ackery; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Luis M. Hernández (2023). HOSTS (from HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants) [Data set resource]. Natural History Museum. https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/hosts/resource/877f387a-36a3-486c-…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/HOSTS
Context: Neotropical · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Neotropical · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L6598370
@article{https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70049, author = {Fuzessy, Lisieux and Pizo, Marco Aurélio}, title = {NeoFrugivory: A comprehensive database for frugivory interactions and functional traits in the Neotropics}, journal = {Ecology}, volume = {106}, number = {3}, pages = {e7004…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/neofrugivory
Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3087268
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3087320
Chapman CA, Fedigan LM, 1990. Dietary differences between neighboring Cebus capucinus groups: Local traditions, food availability or responses to food profitability?.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/neofrugivory
Context: Costa Rica · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Costa Rica · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3096131
No public URL for this record
MacKinnon KC, 2006. Food choice by juvenile Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus capucinus) in a Tropical Dry Forest..
Published in globalbioticinteractions/neofrugivory
Context: Costa Rica · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Costa Rica · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3096147
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
mantled howlerMycetes palliatusAtelidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
@article{https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70049, author = {Fuzessy, Lisieux and Pizo, Marco Aurélio}, title = {NeoFrugivory: A comprehensive database for frugivory interactions and functional traits in the Neotropics}, journal = {Ecology}, volume = {106}, number = {3}, pages = {e7004…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/neofrugivory
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3088199
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 2 of 2, by number of studies
is preyed upon by
2 organisms
This term does declare that the organism harms this species.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Platynota sp. lep99SGTortricidae
is preyed upon by
1
no location
Not a modelling unit: the source did not resolve a species — the name carries an open-nomenclature qualifier.
1 source · 1 record
Gripenberg, S. et al., 2019. A highly resolved food web for insect seed predators in a species‐rich tropical forest F. Jordan, ed. Ecology Letters, 22(10), pp.1638–1649. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13359. Accessed at <https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/BCI…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/BCI_Seed_Predator
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L2892901
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Anthonomus sp. cur45SGCurculionidae
is preyed upon by
1
no location
Not a modelling unit: the source did not resolve a species — the name carries an open-nomenclature qualifier.
1 source · 1 record
Gripenberg, S. et al., 2019. A highly resolved food web for insect seed predators in a species‐rich tropical forest F. Jordan, ed. Ecology Letters, 22(10), pp.1638–1649. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13359. Accessed at <https://github.com/globalbioticinteractions/BCI…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/BCI_Seed_Predator
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L2892862
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 2 of 2, by number of studies
Acompañantes documentados
This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.
Documented uses and recommendations
Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.
Not grouped under a navigation concept
What the source states
Claim type
Context
Source
Actions
Árbol nativo candidato de paisaje
Recommendation of a guideRecommended
coffee · Veracruz, México
Biolítica · compilación de café de CIE-10 sha256:e376ce4d636a
1 source · 1 record
Flores-Ortiz et al. 2025
Context: coffee · Veracruz, México
Claim type
Recommendation of a guide
Version
Biolítica · compilación de café de CIE-10 sha256:e376ce4d636a
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
coffee · Veracruz, MéxicoWhere it is: record:hash://sha256/e376ce4d636a2ad69fd1f35c0c597ef582332fe836e256097909ac8cc8b1081a!/Evidencias!/ID evidencia=E-0547