Identidad taxonómica

Scientific name
Monstera deliciosa Liebm.
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Monstera deliciosa
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
Liebm.
Common names
Ceriman, Delicious Monster, Fruit salad plant, Mexican Breadfruit, Mexican-breadfruit, Swiss Cheese Plant, Swiss-Cheese Plant, Swiss-cheese-plant, Tarovine, Windowleaf Philodendron, cut-leaf-philodendron, fruit-salad-plant, monstera, locust and wild honey
Names in other languages (44)Adams revben, Balazo, Banana-abacaxi, Costela-de-adão, Costilla de Adán, Cérimon, Philodendron, Deve Tabanı, Faux philodendron, Fruit délicieux, Cérimon, Philodendron, Gatenplant, Köstliches Fensterblatt, Mano de léon, Nuostabioji monstera, Philodendron, Piñanona, Queso suizo, amánchacua, ananas-japonês, balazos, banana-de-macaco, banana-do-brejo, banana-do-mato, cuath, cériman, fingerfilodendron, geraamteplant, großes Fensterblatt, harpón, jättipeikonlehti, meeldiv monstera, monstera dziurawa, monstera lahodná, monstera skvostná, piñanona monstera, Монстера деликатесная, Монстера приємна, מונסטרה נאה, ホウライショウ, モンステラ, 蓬來蕉, 蓬莱蕉, 龜背竹, 龜背芋, 몬스테라
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Liliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Alismatales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Araceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Monstera
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
deliciosa
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Reference species
Monstera deliciosa
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name

Photos and conservation status

IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Not available.

No photos have been requested for this species yet.

Interacciones documentadas

GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.

A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.

Types shown: 6 of 6 is a symbiont of × is a host of × interacts with × is eaten by × is adjacent to × has its flowers visited by ×

Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.

is a symbiont of 65 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Parabambusicola bambusina Parabambusicolaceae is a symbiont of 1 not compared
Nectriaceae sp. Nectriaceae is a symbiont of 1 not compared Not a modelling unit: the source did not resolve a species — the name carries an open-nomenclature qualifier.
Neopestalotiopsis foedans Pestalotiopsidaceae is a symbiont of 1 not compared
Microdochium fisheri Amphisphaeriaceae is a symbiont of 1 not compared
Showing 4 of 65, by number of studies See more of this type

is a host of 50 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Macrophoma philodendri Botryosphaeriaceae is a host of 7 not compared
Leptostromella elastica Incertae sedis is a host of 4 not compared
Phyllosticta sp. is a host of 3 no location Not a modelling unit: the source did not resolve a species — the name carries an open-nomenclature qualifier.
Fusicoccum turconii Botryosphaeriaceae is a host of 3 no location
Showing 4 of 50, by number of studies See more of this type

interacts with 17 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Red-legged Banana Spider Cupiennius coccineus Ctenidae interacts with 7 not compared
Bogert's Aquatic Tree Frog Dendropsophus bogerti Hylidae interacts with 4 not compared
Capucinella delicatula Blaberidae interacts with 3 not compared
Catasticta prioneris albescens Pieridae interacts with 2 not compared
Showing 4 of 17, by number of studies See more of this type

is eaten by 2 organisms

This term does declare that the organism harms this species.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Two-spotted Leafhopper Sophonia orientalis Cicadellidae is eaten by 1 no location
Black Thread Scale Ischnaspis longirostris Diaspididae is eaten by 1 no location
Showing 2 of 2, by number of studies

is adjacent to 1 organism

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Macrophoma philodendri Botryosphaeriaceae is adjacent to 2 not compared
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

Flower visit

has its flowers visited by 1 organism

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. Visiting a flower is not pollinating it. «Pollinates» is a different term and a different block, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Spiny-legged Stingless bee Trigona spinipes Apidae has its flowers visited by 2 not compared
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

Acompañantes documentados

This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.

Documented uses and recommendations

Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.

Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.