Identidad taxonómica

Scientific name
Ceodes umbellifera J.R.Forst. & G.Forst.
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Ceodes umbellifera
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
J.R.Forst. & G.Forst.
Common names
Birdcatcher Tree, Bird Lime Tree, Bird-lime Tree, Pāpala Kēpau, Umbrella Catchbirdtree
Names in other languages (6)Udeuidarbekai, ceoda okolíkatá, papala, parapara, ウドノキ, 皮孫木
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Caryophyllales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Nyctaginaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Ceodes
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
umbellifera
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Reference species
Ceodes umbellifera
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name

Photos and conservation status

IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Least concern (LC)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-09 05:18.
Photo of Ceodes umbellifera J.R.Forst. & G.Forst.
Photo: Cheng-Te Hsu · CC BY 4.0 · View original image · Original observation
Photo of Ceodes umbellifera J.R.Forst. & G.Forst.
Photo: Brynn Fricke · CC BY 4.0 · View original image · Original observation
Photo of Ceodes umbellifera J.R.Forst. & G.Forst.
Photo: Damien Wallace · CC0 1.0 · View original image · Original observation
Photo of Ceodes umbellifera J.R.Forst. & G.Forst.
Photo: Kevin Faccenda · CC BY 4.0 · View original image · Original observation
Photo of Ceodes umbellifera J.R.Forst. & G.Forst.
Photo: 謝麗霦 · CC BY 4.0 · View original image · Original observation
Photo of Ceodes umbellifera J.R.Forst. & G.Forst.
Photo: Quinn Campbell · CC0 1.0 · View original image · Original observation

Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-09 05:18.

Interacciones documentadas

GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.

A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.

Types shown: 6 of 6 is a host of × is adjacent to × is pollinated by × is eaten by × hasRoost × interacts with ×

Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.

is a host of 4 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Echidnodes pisoniae Asterinaceae is a host of 3 no location
Phytophthora sp. is a host of 1 no location Not a modelling unit: the source did not resolve a species — the name carries an open-nomenclature qualifier.
Astrothelium congregans Trypetheliaceae is a host of 1 no location
Macrophoma pisoniae Botryosphaeriaceae is a host of 1 no location
Showing 4 of 4, by number of studies

is adjacent to 3 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Tape Fern Haplopteris elongata Pteridaceae is adjacent to 1 no location
Astrothelium congregans Trypetheliaceae is adjacent to 1 not compared
royal tonguefern Elaphoglossum crassifolium Dryopteridaceae is adjacent to 1 no location
Showing 3 of 3, by number of studies

Pollination

is pollinated by 3 organisms

This term declares that the organism benefits this species. «Visits the flowers of» is a different term and a different block: a visitor is not a pollinator, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Diptera is pollinated by 1 no location Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at order level.
Butterflies & Moths Lepidoptera is pollinated by 1 no location Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at order level.
Apoidea is pollinated by 1 no location Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at superfamily level.
Showing 3 of 3, by number of studies

is eaten by 1 organism

This term does declare that the organism harms this species.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Lepanus pisoniae Scarabaeidae is eaten by 1 no location
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

hasRoost 1 organism

No sanctioned reading for this term yet: it is shown exactly as the source publishes it.

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Pacific Flying Fox Pteropus tonganus Pteropodidae hasRoost 1 no location
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

interacts with 1 organism

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism Reads as Studies Where it was documented Actions
Orthotylus pisoniae Miridae interacts with 1 not compared
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

Acompañantes documentados

This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.

Documented uses and recommendations

Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.

Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.