Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L. — The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Zingiber officinale
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank. — The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi). — One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division. — Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida). — Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Liliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera). — Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Zingiberales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family). — Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Zingiberaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays. — Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Zingiber
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays. — The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
officinale
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies. — The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Reference species
Zingiber officinale
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful. — Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name
Photos and conservation status
IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area. — The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Data deficient (DD)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-13 11:21.
Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-13 11:21.
Interacciones documentadas
GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.
A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.
Types shown: 7 of 7
is a host of
×
interacts with
×
is eaten by
×
has as a parasite
×
co-occurs ecologically with
×
is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of
×
has its flowers visited by
×
Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.
is a host of
181 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L212127
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L231080
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L243981
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L255075
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L259695
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L267948
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L274993
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L281908
And 92 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here.
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Phoma zingiberisDidymellaceae
is a host of
9
not compared
9 sources · 13 records
Watson, A.J.. 1971. Foreign bacterial and fungus diseases of food, forage, and fiber crops. U.S.D.A. Agricultural Research Service :111
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Record contexts (sample): Nepal · no date published; China · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Nepal · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4068281
China · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4068284
Taiwan · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4068288
And 2 more records of this source, not listed here.
Cho, W.D., and Shin, H.D., Eds.. 2004. List of plant diseases in Korea. Fourth edition. Korean Society of Plant Pathology :779
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Korea · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Korea · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3767315
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: China · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
China · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3841246
No public URL for this record
Sawada, K.. 1959. Descriptive catalogue of Taiwan (Formosan) fungi. XI. Special Publ. Coll. Agric. Natl. Taiwan Univ. 8:1-268
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Taiwan · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Taiwan · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3995547
No public URL for this record
Anonymous. 1979. List of plant diseases in Taiwan. Pl. Protect. Soc., Republ. of China :404
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Taiwan · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Taiwan · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3998073
No public URL for this record
Zhuang, W.-Y., Ed.. 2001. Higher Fungi of Tropical China. Mycotaxon, Ltd., Ithaca, NY :485
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: China · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
China · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4014633
No public URL for this record
Giatgong, P.. 1980. Host Index of Plant Diseases in Thailand. Second Edition. Mycology Branch, Plant Pathology and Microbiology Division, Department of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, Thailand -:118
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Thailand · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Thailand · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4050978
No public URL for this record
And 1 more source, with fewer records, not listed here.
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Agroathelia rolfsiiAmylocorticiaceae
is a host of
8
no location
8 sources · 8 records
Alfieri Jr., S.A., Langdon, K.R., Wehlburg, C., and Kimbrough, J.W.. 1984. Index of Plant Diseases in Florida (Revised). Florida Dept. Agric. and Consumer Serv., Div. Plant Ind. Bull. 11:1-389
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: United States · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
United States · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3679892
No public URL for this record
Simmonds, J.H.. 1966. Host index of plant diseases in Queensland. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane :111
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Australia · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Australia · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3761665
No public URL for this record
Urtiaga, R.. 2004?. Indice de enfermedades en plantas de Venezuela y Cuba, Second Edition. Unknown journal or publisher :301
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Venezuela · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Venezuela · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3980064
No public URL for this record
Firman, I.D.. 1972. A list of fungi and plant parasitic bacteria, viruses and nematodes in Fiji. Phytopathol. Pap. 15:1-36
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Fiji · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Fiji · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3982718
No public URL for this record
Anonymous. 1979. List of plant diseases in Taiwan. Pl. Protect. Soc., Republ. of China :404
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Taiwan · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Taiwan · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3996169
No public URL for this record
Gorter, G.J.M.A.. 1977. Index of plant pathogens and the diseases they cause in cultivated plants in South Africa. Republic South Africa Dept. Agric. Techn. Serv. Pl. Protect. Res. Inst. Sci. Bull. 392:1-177
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: South Africa · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
South Africa · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4016324
No public URL for this record
Orieux, L., and Felix, S.. 1968. List of plant diseases in Mauritius.. Phytopathol. Pap. 7:1-48
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Mauritius · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Mauritius · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4024099
No public URL for this record
Giatgong, P.. 1980. Host Index of Plant Diseases in Thailand. Second Edition. Mycology Branch, Plant Pathology and Microbiology Division, Department of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, Thailand -:118
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Thailand · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Thailand · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4051152
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Pythium myriotylumPythiaceae
is a host of
8
no location
8 sources · 8 records
Cho, W.D., and Shin, H.D., Eds.. 2004. List of plant diseases in Korea. Fourth edition. Korean Society of Plant Pathology :779
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Korea · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Korea · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3767579
No public URL for this record
Anonymous. 1979. List of plant diseases in Taiwan. Pl. Protect. Soc., Republ. of China :404
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Taiwan · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Taiwan · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3998573
No public URL for this record
Liu, P.S.W.. 1977. A supplement to a host list of plant diseases in Sabah, Malaysia.. Phytopathol. Pap. 21:1-49
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Malaysia · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Malaysia · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4002234
No public URL for this record
Wang, P.H., Chung, C.Y., Lin, Y.S., and Yeh, Y.. 2003. Use of polymerase chain reaction to detect the soft rot pathogen, %Pythium myriotylum%, in infected ginger rhizomes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 36:116-120
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Taiwan · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Taiwan · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4149696
No public URL for this record
Adikaram, N.K.B., and Yakandawala, D.M.D.. 2020. A checklist of plant pathogenic fungi and Oomycota in Sri Lanka. Ceylon J. Sci. 49(1):93-123
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Sri Lanka · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Sri Lanka · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4156429
No public URL for this record
Misra, J.K., and Hall, G.S.. 1996. Occurrence and distribution of the genus %Pythium% in India: A review. Kavaka 24:57-119
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: India · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
India · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4261519
No public URL for this record
Le, D.P., Smith, M.K., and Aitken, E.A.B.. 2017. Species delimitation in %Pythium% species complexes: the case of %Pythium myriotylum% Drechsler and %Pythium zingiberis% Takahashi. Mycol. Progr. 16(3):257-267
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Australia · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Australia · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4292151
No public URL for this record
Le, D.P., Smith, M.K., and Aitken, E.A.B.. 2016. An assessment of %Pythium% spp. associated with soft rot disease of ginger (%Zingiber officinale%) in Queensland, Australia. Australas. Pl. Pathol. 45(4):377-387
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Australia · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Australia · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4347870
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Japan · Aug. 14, 1936As published: 1936-08-14T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L11349285
Context: London, England, United Kingdom · April 13, 1960
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
London, England, United Kingdom · April 13, 1960As published: 1960-04-13T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L11349524
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Japan · July 1, 1933As published: 1933-07-01T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L11350205
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Mexico · Oct. 19, 1945As published: 1945-10-19T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L11349262
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Cuba · Sept. 10, 1942As published: 1942-09-10T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L11349379
Published in globalbioticinteractions/arthropodEasyCaptureAMNH
Context: Redwood City · Aug. 27, 2000 · LabelObservation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Redwood City · Aug. 27, 2000 · LabelObservationAs published: 2000-08-27T00:00:00Z · LabelObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L15921446
Context: Tahiti · March 30, 1964 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Tahiti · March 30, 1964 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1964-03-30T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L8955285
This term does declare that the organism harms this species.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Potato Knot-hornEuzophera osseatellaPyralidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Edward Baker; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Amoret Whitaker; Steen Dupont; Vincent Smith; John S Noyes (2017). NHM Interactions Bank. https://doi.org/10.5519/0060767. Accessed at <https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/82e807f0-6273-4f19-be0a-7f7558442a25/resource/f84ad9f1-bd0c-4811…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18742586
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Opogona regressaTineidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Edward Baker; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Amoret Whitaker; Steen Dupont; Vincent Smith; John S Noyes (2017). NHM Interactions Bank. https://doi.org/10.5519/0060767. Accessed at <https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/82e807f0-6273-4f19-be0a-7f7558442a25/resource/f84ad9f1-bd0c-4811…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18751541
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Asian Cotton LeafwormSpodoptera lituraNoctuidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Edward Baker; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Amoret Whitaker; Steen Dupont; Vincent Smith; John S Noyes (2017). NHM Interactions Bank. https://doi.org/10.5519/0060767. Accessed at <https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/82e807f0-6273-4f19-be0a-7f7558442a25/resource/f84ad9f1-bd0c-4811…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18727514
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Banana MothOpogona sacchariTineidae
is eaten by
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Edward Baker; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Amoret Whitaker; Steen Dupont; Vincent Smith; John S Noyes (2017). NHM Interactions Bank. https://doi.org/10.5519/0060767. Accessed at <https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/82e807f0-6273-4f19-be0a-7f7558442a25/resource/f84ad9f1-bd0c-4811…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18751646
This term does declare that the organism harms this species.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Aglenchus agricola
has as a parasite
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
ABRS 2009. Australian Faunal Directory. Aglenchus agricola. Australian Biological Resources StudyNode, Canberra. Accessed at <http://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/9cc0863f-124a-0b3b-e044-00144f3b4a43> on 04 Sep 2026.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/siad
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18984625
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
DitylenchusAnguinidae
has as a parasite
1
no location
Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at genus level.
1 source · 1 record
ABRS 2009. Australian Faunal Directory. Ditylenchus. Australian Biological Resources StudyNode, Canberra. Accessed at <http://biodiversity.org.au/afd/taxa/9cc0863f-0f86-0b3b-e044-00144f3b4a43> on 04 Sep 2026.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/siad
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18987635
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Spalangia geminaPteromalidae
has as a parasite
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Abdull989 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database
Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L18909807
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 3 of 3, by number of studies
co-occurs ecologically with
2 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Funneliformis caledoniumGlomeraceae
co-occurs ecologically with
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
S. Pehim Limbu, S.L. Stürmer, G. Zahn, C.A. Aguilar-Trigueros, N. Rogers, & V.B. Chaudhary, Climate-linked biogeography of mycorrhizal fungal spore traits, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (29) e2505059122, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2505059122 (2025). Accessed at <https://gi…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/limbu2025
Context: no place published · Jan. 1, 2014
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Jan. 1, 2014As published: 2014-01-01T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L13415749
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Rhizophagus manihotisGlomeraceae
co-occurs ecologically with
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
S. Pehim Limbu, S.L. Stürmer, G. Zahn, C.A. Aguilar-Trigueros, N. Rogers, & V.B. Chaudhary, Climate-linked biogeography of mycorrhizal fungal spore traits, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (29) e2505059122, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2505059122 (2025). Accessed at <https://gi…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/limbu2025
Context: no place published · Jan. 1, 2014
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Jan. 1, 2014As published: 2014-01-01T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L13406432
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 2 of 2, by number of studies
is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of
2 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Rhizophagus manihotisGlomeraceae
is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of
1
not compared
1 source · 9 records
Wang, C., Zheng, M.M., Song, W.F., Chen, R.F., Zhao, X.Q., Wen, S.L., Zheng, Z.S. and Shen, R.F., 2021. Biogeographic patterns and co-occurrence networks of diazotrophic and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in the acidic soil ecosystem of southern China.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/globalamfungi
Record contexts (sample): Asia · Jan. 1, 2014; Asia · Jan. 1, 2014
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Asia · Jan. 1, 2014As published: 2014-01-01T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L14335427
Asia · Jan. 1, 2014As published: 2014-01-01T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L14335428
Asia · Jan. 1, 2014As published: 2014-01-01T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L14335436
And 6 more records of this source, not listed here.
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Funneliformis caledoniusGlomeraceae
is an arbuscular mycorrhizal host of
1
not compared
1 source · 6 records
Wang, C., Zheng, M.M., Song, W.F., Chen, R.F., Zhao, X.Q., Wen, S.L., Zheng, Z.S. and Shen, R.F., 2021. Biogeographic patterns and co-occurrence networks of diazotrophic and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in the acidic soil ecosystem of southern China.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/globalamfungi
Record contexts (sample): Asia · Jan. 1, 2014; Asia · Jan. 1, 2014
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Asia · Jan. 1, 2014As published: 2014-01-01T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L14338847
Asia · Jan. 1, 2014As published: 2014-01-01T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L14338848
Asia · Jan. 1, 2014As published: 2014-01-01T00:00:00ZWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L14338850
And 3 more records of this source, not listed here.
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 2 of 2, by number of studies
Flower visit
has its flowers visited by
1 organism
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. Visiting a flower is not pollinating it. «Pollinates» is a different term and a different block, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.
Context: no place published · Aug. 2, 2021 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Aug. 2, 2021 · Human observationAs published: 2021-08-02T16:42:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5862182
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
Acompañantes documentados
This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.
Documented uses and recommendations
Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.
Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.
