Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L. — The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Quararibea funebris
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank. — The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
(La Llave) Vischer
Common names
Names in other languages (4)Molinillo, kvararibea pohrebná, majash, 葬儀木
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi). — One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division. — Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida). — Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera). — Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Malvales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family). — Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Malvaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays. — Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Quararibea
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays. — The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
funebris
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies. — The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful. — Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name
Photos and conservation status
IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area. — The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Not available.
No photos have been requested for this species yet.
Interacciones documentadas
GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.
A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.
Types shown: 3 of 3
is eaten by
×
is a host of
×
has as a vector
×
Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.
is eaten by
5 organisms
This term does declare that the organism harms this species.
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Mexico · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L13389909
No public URL for this record
Estrada, A., R. Coates-Estrada, C. V�squez-Yanes & A. Orozco-Segovia. 1984. Comparison of frugivory by howling monkeys (Alouatta palliata) and bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) in the tropical rain forest of Lost Tuxtlas, Mexico. American Journal of Primatology 7: 3-13
Published in globalbioticinteractions/NeoBat_Interactions
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L24374222
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Great Fruit-eating BatArtibeus lituratusPhyllostomidae
is eaten by
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
Vleut 2015
Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020
Context: Mexico · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Mexico · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L13389912
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Mexico · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L13389939
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Florez-Montero GL, Muylaert RL, Nogueira MR, Geiselman C, Santana SE, Stevens RD, Tschapka M, Rodrigues FA, Mello MAR, 2022. NeoBat Interactions: A data set of bat–plant interactions in the Neotropics.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/neofrugivory
Context: Neotropics · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Neotropics · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L3084711
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Anastrepha crebraTephritidae
is a host of
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Aluja, Martín and Piñero, Jaime and López, Maurilio and Ruíz, César and Zúñiga, Alberto and Piedra, Enrique and Díaz-Fleischer, Francisco and Sivinski, John. New Host Plant and Distribution Records in Mexico for Anastrepha Spp., Toxotrypana Curvicauda Gerstacker, Rhagoletis Zoqu…
Published in millerse/Aluja-et-al-New-Host-Plant-and-Distribution-Records-in-Mexico
Context: Veracruz, Mexico · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Veracruz, Mexico · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L147403
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Anastrepha crebra
is a host of
1
no location
1 source · 1 record
Aluja, Martín and Piñero, Jaime and López, Maurilio and Ruíz, César and Zúñiga, Alberto and Piedra, Enrique and Díaz-Fleischer, Francisco and Sivinski, John. New Host Plant and Distribution Records in Mexico for Anastrepha Spp., Toxotrypana Curvicauda Gerstacker, Rhagoletis Zoqu…
Published in millerse/Host-plant-and-distribution-records
Context: Veracruz, Mexico · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Veracruz, Mexico · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L728069
Orozco-Segovia, A. & C. Vázquez-Yanes. 1982. Plants and fruit bat interactions in a tropical rain forest area, southeastern Mexico. Brenesia 19/20: 137-149.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/batbase
Context: Los Tuxtlas · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Los Tuxtlas · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12440070
No public URL for this record
Orozco-Segovia, A., et al. 1985. Interacciones entre una población de murciélagos de la especie Artibeus jamaicensis y la vegetación delárea circundante, en la región de Los Tuxlas, Veracruz. In: Investigaciones sobre la regeneracion de selvas altas en Veracruz, Mexico (A. Gomez…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/batbase
Context: Los Tuxtlas · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Los Tuxtlas · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12440102
No public URL for this record
Estrada, A., et al. 1984. Comparison of frugivory by howling monkeys (Alouatta palliata) and bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) in the tropical rain forest of Lost Tuxtlas, Mexico. American Journal of Primatology 7: 3-13.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/batbase
Context: Los Tuxtlas Biological Station · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Los Tuxtlas Biological Station · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12440700
No public URL for this record
Gardner, A. L. 1977. Feeding habits. In: Biology of bats of the New World family Phyllostomatidae. Part II (R. J. Baker, J. K. Jones & D. C. Carter, eds.). pp. 293-350. The Museum, Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, USA.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/batbase
Context: Mexico · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Mexico · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12441135
No public URL for this record
Vázquez-Yanes, C., et al. 1975. Observations on seed dispersal by bats in a tropical humid region in Veracruz, Mexico. Biotropica 7 (2): 73-76.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/batbase
Context: Los Tuxtlas · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Los Tuxtlas · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12443429
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
Acompañantes documentados
This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.
Documented uses and recommendations
Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.
Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.
