Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L. — The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Pouteria campechiana
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank. — The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
(Kunth) Baehni
Common names
Canistel, eggfruit tree, eggfruit-tree, yellow sapoteNames in other languages (2)canistelsapote, sapota-amarela
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi). — One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division. — Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida). — Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera). — Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Ericales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family). — Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Sapotaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays. — Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Pouteria
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays. — The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
campechiana
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies. — The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Reference species
Pouteria campechiana
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful. — Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name
Photos and conservation status
IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area. — The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Least concern (LC)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-13 11:13.
Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-13 11:13.
Interacciones documentadas
GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.
A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.
Types shown: 5 of 5
is a host of
×
is eaten by
×
has as a vector
×
interacts with
×
is a symbiont of
×
Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.
is a host of
24 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Colocho · March 13, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Colocho · March 13, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-03-13T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12937675
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Colocho · March 12, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Colocho · March 12, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-03-12T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12937676
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Colocho · March 12, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Colocho · March 12, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-03-12T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12937780
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Colocho · March 12, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Colocho · March 12, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-03-12T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12937781
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · Aug. 23, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · Aug. 23, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-08-23T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12941331
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · July 30, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · July 30, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-07-30T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12941334
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · Aug. 20, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · Aug. 20, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-08-20T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12941335
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · Aug. 19, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · Aug. 19, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-08-19T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12941337
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Orosilito · May 31, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Orosilito · May 31, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-05-31T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12938228
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Orosilito · June 12, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Orosilito · June 12, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-06-12T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12938229
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Orosilito · June 12, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Orosilito · June 12, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-06-12T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12938230
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Orosilito · May 31, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Orosilito · May 31, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-05-31T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12939535
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Orosilito · May 31, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Sendero Orosilito · May 31, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-05-31T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12939536
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Del Oro, Camino Mangos · Aug. 2, 2003 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Del Oro, Camino Mangos · Aug. 2, 2003 · Material sampleAs published: 2003-08-02T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12921595
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Del Oro, Camino Mangos · Aug. 3, 2003 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Del Oro, Camino Mangos · Aug. 3, 2003 · Material sampleAs published: 2003-08-03T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12921596
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa, Quebrada Guapote · July 21, 1993 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa, Quebrada Guapote · July 21, 1993 · Material sampleAs published: 1993-07-21T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12922458
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa, Quebrada Guapote · July 31, 1993 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Santa Rosa, Quebrada Guapote · July 31, 1993 · Material sampleAs published: 1993-07-31T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12922459
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · July 18, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · July 18, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-07-18T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12941614
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · July 15, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · July 15, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-07-15T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12942490
Context: Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · July 20, 2009 · Material sample
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Area de Conservacion Guanacaste, Sector Pitilla, Leonel · July 20, 2009 · Material sampleAs published: 2009-07-20T00:00:00Z · MATERIAL_SAMPLEWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12942686
Silva-Taboada, G. 1979. Los murciélagos de Cuba. pp. 1-423. Editorial Academia, Havana, Cuba.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/batbase
Context: Cuba · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Cuba · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12442869
No public URL for this record
Estrada, A., R. Coates-Estrada, C. V�squez-Yanes & A. Orozco-Segovia. 1984. Comparison of frugivory by howling monkeys (Alouatta palliata) and bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) in the tropical rain forest of Lost Tuxtlas, Mexico. American Journal of Primatology 7: 3-13
Published in globalbioticinteractions/NeoBat_Interactions
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L24374224
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
has as a vector
1 organism
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
Orozco-Segovia, A. & C. Vázquez-Yanes. 1982. Plants and fruit bat interactions in a tropical rain forest area, southeastern Mexico. Brenesia 19/20: 137-149.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/batbase
Context: Los Tuxtlas · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Los Tuxtlas · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12440067
No public URL for this record
Orozco-Segovia, A., et al. 1985. Interacciones entre una población de murciélagos de la especie Artibeus jamaicensis y la vegetación delárea circundante, en la región de Los Tuxlas, Veracruz. In: Investigaciones sobre la regeneracion de selvas altas en Veracruz, Mexico (A. Gomez…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/batbase
Context: Los Tuxtlas · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Los Tuxtlas · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12440099
No public URL for this record
Estrada, A., et al. 1984. Comparison of frugivory by howling monkeys (Alouatta palliata) and bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) in the tropical rain forest of Lost Tuxtlas, Mexico. American Journal of Primatology 7: 3-13.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/batbase
Context: Los Tuxtlas Biological Station · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Los Tuxtlas Biological Station · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12440683
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
interacts with
1 organism
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
is a symbiont of
1 organism
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Fungi Including LichensFungi
is a symbiont of
1
no location
Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at kingdom level.
1 source · 2 records
Perez TM, Valverde-Barrantes O, Bravo C, Taylor CC, Fadrique B, Hogan JA, Pardo CJ, Stroud JT, Baraloto C, Feeley KJ. 2018. Botanic gardens are an untapped resource for studying the functional traits of tropical plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 374: 201…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/fred
Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L24446613
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L24446664
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
Acompañantes documentados
This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.
Documented uses and recommendations
Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.
Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.
