Yellow Blossom (Tecoma stans)

← Back to the species catalog

Identidad taxonómica

Scientific name: Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex Kunth
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.: Tecoma stans
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.: (L.) Juss. ex Kunth
Common names: Yellow Blossom, Yellow Trumpetbush, Ginger Thomas, Ginger-Thomas, Golden Seal, Trumpetbush, Yellow Bells, esperanza, tecoma, trumpet-flower, trumpetflower, yellow elder, yellow trumpet flower, yellow trumpet-flower, yellow-bells, yellow-elder, yellow tecoma
Names in other languages (61)
Bois pissenlit, Bois pissenlit, Bois Caraïbe, Chevalier, Chicalá, Chirlobirlo, Cholan, Fresno, Gelbblühender Trompetenbaum, Gelbe Trompetenblume, Gele Bignonia, Geltonoji tekoma, Gualpe, Guarán, Huaranhuay, Ipê-de-jardim, Kelki Hel, Killu sisa, Lalame, Lame, Palo de arco, Piti, Roble amarillo, Ruibarba, Sarı Trompet, Sauco amarillo; Ginger Thomas, Sawsaw, Saúco amarillo, Tecoma, Bignonia jaune, Bois pissenlit, Trompette d'or, Tekoma prosta, Tepla, Trompette d'or, Técome droit, Técoma droit, Bois pissenlit, Bois Caraïbe, Trompette d'or, Bignone jaune, Piti, Yellow cedar, amarelinho, bignonia-amarela, geelklokkies, guarán amarillo, guarã-guarã, gul trumpetbuske, ipezinho-de-jardim, ipê-amarelo-de-jardim, k'an-lol, keltatekoma, kohai, pïti, sinos-amarelos, tekoma vzpriamená, tekoma vzpřímená, timboco, trompetilla, tronadora, vainillo, Текома прямостоячая, דק-פרי זקוף, تيكومة صفراء, تيكومة واقفة, વસંત, කැළණිතිස්ස, ทองอุไร, キンレイジュ, 黃鐘花
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).: Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.: Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).: Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).: Lamiales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).: Bignoniaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.: Tecoma
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.: stans
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.: species
Reference species: Tecoma stans
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.: accepted name

Photos and conservation status

IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.: Least concern (LC)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-12 18:02.

Photo of Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. ex Kunth — Photo: Jacob Saucier · CC BY 4.0 · View original image · Original observation

Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-12 18:02.

Interacciones documentadas

GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.

A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.

Types shown: 12 of 12 has its flowers visited by × interacts with × is eaten by × is a host of × is visited by × is adjacent to × has as a parasite × visits the flowers of × co-occurs ecologically with × eats × has as a vector × is preyed upon by ×

Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.

Flower visit

has its flowers visited by 119 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. Visiting a flower is not pollinating it. «Pollinates» is a different term and a different block, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
European Honey Bee Apis mellifera Apidae	has its flowers visited by	17	not compared
17 sources · 18 records Cyrille, N., Lelièvre, Y., Dumbardon-Martial, E. et al. Wild insect flower visitor assemblages and resource use in tropical gardens: driven by floral offer, modulated by honeybees. Biodivers Conserv 35, 213 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-026-03395-9. Accessed at <https:/… Published in globalbioticinteractions/cyrille2026 Record contexts (sample): Martinique · 0022-01-12T00:00:00Z; Martinique · no date published https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/99592260 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 27, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/99848950 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 30, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/99932164 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 1, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/202568571 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Feb. 26, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/117691811 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 18, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/118366164 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 23, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/118366165 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 23, 2022 · Human observation And 9 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
American Bumble Bee Bombus pensylvanicus Apidae	has its flowers visited by	15	not compared
15 sources · 16 records https://www.bumblebeewatch.org/metadata/ Published in globalbioticinteractions/gbif-us-bees Record contexts (sample): no place published · July 11, 2024 · Human observation; no place published · July 11, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/295718002 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 6, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/7135731 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 20, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/8500516 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 10, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/8500621 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 10, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/8712219 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 9, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/8712761 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 9, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/320033612 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 10, 2025 · Human observation And 7 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Sonoran Bumble Bee Bombus sonorus Apidae	has its flowers visited by	10	not compared
10 sources · 14 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/297013919 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · July 11, 2025 · Human observation; no place published · July 11, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/311066917 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · Sept. 2, 2025 · Human observation; no place published · Sept. 2, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/312315683 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · Sept. 6, 2025 · Human observation; no place published · Sept. 6, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/93036763 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · Aug. 21, 2021 · Human observation; no place published · Aug. 21, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/304697802 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 7, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/305393542 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 9, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/7384804 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 4, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/7413075 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 5, 2017 · Human observation And 2 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Costa's Hummingbird Calypte costae Trochilidae	has its flowers visited by	7	not compared
7 sources · 7 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/99592400 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 27, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/100322902 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 5, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/18460587 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 13, 2018 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/142494099 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 16, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/142641777 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 23, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/189067894 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 26, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/192162524 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 23, 2023 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 119, by number of studies See more of this type

visits the flowers of 2 organisms

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Gold Rim Swallowtail Battus polydamas Papilionidae	visits the flowers of	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/295136728 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 4, 2025 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Pipevine Swallowtail Battus philenor philenor Papilionidae	visits the flowers of	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/295136858 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 4, 2025 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 2 of 2, by number of studies

interacts with 62 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Prospodium transformans Uropyxidaceae	interacts with	39	not compared
39 sources · 42 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/24391971 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · April 29, 2019 · Human observation; no place published · April 29, 2019 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/43439920 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · April 25, 2020 · Human observation; no place published · April 25, 2020 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/43743178 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Record contexts (sample): no place published · April 26, 2020 · Human observation; no place published · April 26, 2020 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/203133875 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 16, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/109416614 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 24, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/5593259 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · April 6, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/115145524 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 2, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/314101475 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 13, 2025 · Human observation And 31 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Apoidea	interacts with	26	not compared	Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at superfamily level.
26 sources · 26 records 73d5d8e9-db4d-46b7-97d2-ecfaf539489e Published in globalbioticinteractions/ku-semc Context: Heloderma Nature Reserve, road to · Nov. 21, 2016 · Preserved specimen dbbbf37f-52ac-46cc-994a-0335631a61dc Published in globalbioticinteractions/ku-semc Context: Heloderma Nature Reserve, road to · Nov. 21, 2016 · Preserved specimen a8ebf142-34b7-46fb-9ffb-e88de635184b Published in globalbioticinteractions/ku-semc Context: Heloderma Nature Reserve, road to · Nov. 21, 2016 · Preserved specimen bc7f7ca1-d778-41ad-8470-c8a782c86e8a Published in globalbioticinteractions/ku-semc Context: Heloderma Nature Reserve, road to · Nov. 21, 2016 · Preserved specimen a1777450-b5fd-4563-bbc4-d42fa1e7824f Published in globalbioticinteractions/ku-semc Context: Heloderma Nature Reserve, road to · Nov. 21, 2016 · Preserved specimen 9b430d44-f3ab-41c7-883b-825e8bbe96cf Published in globalbioticinteractions/ku-semc Context: Heloderma Nature Reserve, road to · Nov. 21, 2016 · Preserved specimen 73641a56-95f3-434e-b7c1-a3db29311ad8 Published in globalbioticinteractions/ku-semc Context: Heloderma Nature Reserve, road to · Nov. 21, 2016 · Preserved specimen 2f2a9c12-67d0-4547-abb8-d2af2bf0cadd Published in globalbioticinteractions/ku-semc Context: Heloderma Nature Reserve, road to · Nov. 21, 2016 · Preserved specimen And 18 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Eastern Carpenter Xylocopa virginica Apidae	interacts with	20	not compared
20 sources · 20 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3517562 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 24, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3570187 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · June 30, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3583393 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 1, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3621751 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 3, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3625842 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 4, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3685317 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 14, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3689838 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 15, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3701838 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 17, 2016 · Human observation And 12 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
American Bumble Bee Bombus pensylvanicus Apidae	interacts with	11	not compared
11 sources · 11 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3581747 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 1, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3770186 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 30, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3813952 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 6, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3833463 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 8, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/3860511 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 11, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/4038013 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 23, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/4144493 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 25, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/7135731 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 20, 2017 · Human observation And 3 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 62, by number of studies See more of this type

is eaten by 58 organisms

This term does declare that the organism harms this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Giant Honey Bee Apis dorsata Apidae	is eaten by	23	not compared
23 sources · 23 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/202944039 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 17, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/103459895 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 22, 2021 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/108018131 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 6, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/108022844 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 6, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/108234869 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 9, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/108239103 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · March 9, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/317185659 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 28, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/317463706 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 29, 2025 · Human observation And 15 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Blue Mormon Papilio polymnestor Papilionidae	is eaten by	7	not compared
7 sources · 7 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/297571061 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 2, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/311685624 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 2, 2017 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/330403770 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 1, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/246627832 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 8, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/383720554 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 14, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/390090276 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Feb. 7, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/292578538 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 22, 2021 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Southern Birdwing Troides minos Papilionidae	is eaten by	6	not compared
6 sources · 6 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/311442994 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 11, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/329585078 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 4, 2025 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/261701816 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · May 20, 2024 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/390193734 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 11, 2026 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/391751168 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 16, 2026 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/196294550 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Sept. 17, 2023 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
European Honey Bee Apis mellifera Apidae	is eaten by	5	not compared
5 sources · 5 records Montoya, A.M. (2018) Determinado por Rodriguez, A. & Montoya, A.M. Published in globalbioticinteractions/delrisco2021 Context: Bogotá, Colombia · no date published Fagúndez. G. (2011) Estudio de los recurdos nectaríferos y poliníferos utilizados por Apis mellifera L. en diferentes ecosistemas del departamento Diamante (Entre Ríos, Argentina). PhD. Thesis. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Bahia Blanca, Argentina. Published in globalbioticinteractions/delrisco2021 Context: Bogotá, Colombia · no date published Rodríguez, A. 2541 JBB Published in globalbioticinteractions/delrisco2021 Context: Bogotá, Colombia · no date published https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/345145633 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Oct. 13, 2022 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/64168725 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 3, 2020 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 58, by number of studies See more of this type

is a host of 56 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Prospodium appendiculatum Uropyxidaceae	is a host of	122	not compared
122 sources · 122 records https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11614954 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Kingston · Feb. 9, 1891 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11614955 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Oaxaca · Oct. 25, 1899 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11614956 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Paitilla · Sept. 8, 1924 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11614957 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Mex. 80, 13 mi. E of Cd. Mante, Tamps. · Sept. 26, 1963 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11614958 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Laguna Mountains · March 2, 1928 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11553309 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: La Caja, near San Jose · Dec. 24, 1924 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11553359 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: La Caja, near San Jose · Dec. 24, 1924 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11553551 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Maiquetia, near La Guaira · Dec. 5, 1924 · Preserved specimen And 114 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Prospodium transformans Uropyxidaceae	is a host of	47	not compared
47 sources · 47 records https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11614989 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Palin · Dec. 24, 1916 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=905898 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Santiago de Las Vega · Jan. 6, 1907 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=925878 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Port Au Prince along source of Bizoton, vicinity of · March 1, 1926 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=925879 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Port Au Prince along road to Petioriville, vicinity of · May 19, 1929 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=925888 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Nassau, New Providence · March 1, 1904 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=925889 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Nassau, New Providence · March 1, 1904 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=925890 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Palin, Amatitlan · Dec. 24, 1916 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=925891 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Havana · March 3, 1903 · Preserved specimen And 39 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Prospodium appendiculatum	is a host of	36	no location
36 sources · 63 records Hernandez, J.R., and Hennen, J.F.. 2003. Rust fungi causing galls, witches' brooms, and other abnormal plant growths in northwestern Argentina. Mycologia 95:728-755 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Virgin Islands · no date published; Jamaica · no date published Baker, R.E.D., and Dale, W.T.. 1948. Fungi of Barbados and the Windward Islands.. Mycol. Pap. 25:1-26 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Saint Vincent · no date published; Grenada · no date published Stevenson, J.A.. 1975. Fungi of Puerto Rico and the American Virgin Islands. Contr. Reed Herb. 23:743 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Puerto Rico · no date published; Virgin Islands · no date published Dennis, R.W.G.. 1970. Kew Bulletin Additional Series III. Fungus Flora of Venezuela and Adjacent Countries.. Verlag von J. Cramer :531 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Venezuela · no date published; Trinidad and Tobago · no date published Urtiaga, R.. 1986. Indice de enfermedades en plantas de Venezuela y Cuba. Impresos en Impresos Nuevo Siglo. S.R.L., Barquisimeto, Venezuela :202 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): Venezuela · no date published; Cuba · no date published Cummins, G.B.. 1962. Supplement to Arthur's Manual of Rusts in the United States and Canada. Hafner Publishing Company :24 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Record contexts (sample): United States · no date published; United States · no date published Alfieri Jr., S.A., Langdon, K.R., Wehlburg, C., and Kimbrough, J.W.. 1984. Index of Plant Diseases in Florida (Revised). Florida Dept. Agric. and Consumer Serv., Div. Plant Ind. Bull. 11:1-389 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: United States · no date published Mendes, M.A.S., da Silva, V.L., Dianese, J.C., and et al.. 1998. Fungos em Plants no Brasil. Embrapa-SPI/Embrapa-Cenargen, Brasilia :555 Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host Context: Brazil · no date published And 28 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Prospodium appendiculatum Uropyxidaceae	is a host of	19	not compared
19 sources · 19 records https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=740303 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Kingston · Feb. 9, 1891 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=740304 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Kingston · Feb. 19, 1915 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=910724 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Yautepec · Oct. 23, 1903 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=910725 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Oaxaca · Nov. 11, 1903 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=11205898 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Yautepec · Oct. 23, 1903 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=3164576 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · Oct. 23, 1903 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4003649 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Yautepee · Oct. 23, 1903 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2936542 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · Oct. 25, 1899 · Preserved specimen And 11 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 56, by number of studies See more of this type

is visited by 15 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Sparkling Violetear Colibri coruscans Trochilidae	is visited by	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/176530044 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 16, 2023 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/176530047 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 16, 2023 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
European Honey Bee Apis mellifera Apidae	is visited by	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/334514302 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Jan. 5, 2026 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/57408681 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 23, 2020 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Red and Black Mason Wasp Pachodynerus erynnis Vespidae	is visited by	2	not compared
2 sources · 2 records https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/4037914 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 23, 2016 · Human observation https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/4111954 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Aug. 23, 2016 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Black Flowerpiercer Diglossa humeralis Thraupidae	is visited by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/176383537 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · July 15, 2023 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 15, by number of studies See more of this type

is adjacent to 11 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Apiform Morning glory-Digger Ancyloscelis apiformis Apidae	is adjacent to	19	no location
19 sources · 19 records https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397820 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0021-07-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397361 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0015-06-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397843 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0006-08-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397813 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0007-10-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397822 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0021-07-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397818 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0007-10-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397819 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0007-10-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397821 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0021-07-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen And 11 more sources, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Margined Turret Bee Melitoma marginella Apidae	is adjacent to	8	no location
8 sources · 8 records https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397828 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0007-08-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397824 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0021-07-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397827 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0007-08-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397839 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0006-08-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397825 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0021-07-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397811 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0007-10-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397826 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0007-08-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397363 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0015-06-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Prospodium appendiculatum Uropyxidaceae	is adjacent to	6	not compared
6 sources · 6 records c6f3d2a3-79cf-47d1-a53f-4f1cce010620 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fmnh Context: no place published · Oct. 23, 1903 · Preserved specimen 34dd9d87-2fd3-45ac-b88d-1612825da6af Published in globalbioticinteractions/fmnh Context: no place published · Oct. 23, 1903 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=3164576 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · Oct. 23, 1903 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2936542 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · Oct. 25, 1899 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=2108913 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: Yautepec · Oct. 23, 1903 · Preserved specimen https://mycoportal.org/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=4792653 Published in globalbioticinteractions/mycoportal Context: no place published · Oct. 23, 1903 · Exsiccati A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Ancyloscelis sejunctus Apidae	is adjacent to	3	no location
3 sources · 3 records https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397829 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0007-08-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397830 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0007-08-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen https://scan-bugs.org:443/portal/collections/individual/index.php?occid=21397812 Published in globalbioticinteractions/scan Context: No further locality · 0007-10-01T00:00:00Z · Preserved specimen A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 11, by number of studies See more of this type

has as a parasite 5 organisms

This term does declare that the organism harms this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Phoradendron tonduzii Viscaceae	has as a parasite	1	no location
1 source · 1 record http://parasiticplants.siu.edu/Viscaceae/index.html Published in millerse/parasitic-plant-connection Context: Madriz, Nicaragua · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Membracis mexicana Membracidae	has as a parasite	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/100853045 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Nov. 10, 2021 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Neochrysocharis Eulophidae	has as a parasite	1	no location	Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at genus level.
1 source · 1 record Gaona RuMy2006 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Anusioptera Encyrtidae	has as a parasite	1	no location	Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at genus level.
1 source · 1 record Gaona RuMy2006 via Universal Chalcidoidea Database Published in globalbioticinteractions/natural-history-museum-london-interactions-bank Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 5, by number of studies See more of this type

co-occurs ecologically with 1 organism

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Aconophora Membracidae	co-occurs ecologically with	1	not compared	Not a modelling unit: the source publishes it at genus level.
1 source · 1 record Arias, M. (2019) Algunas anotaciones sobre la biología de las espinitas (Hemiptera: Membracidae Rafinesque, 1815) del sendero principal de la Quebrada La Vieja. Trabajo de grado pregrado, Universidad Pedagógica de Colombia. Colombia: Bogotá DC. Published in globalbioticinteractions/delrisco2021 Context: Bogotá, Colombia · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

eats 1 organism

This term declares that the organism benefits this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Yellow Blossom Tecoma stans Bignoniaceae	eats	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/254810807 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 11, 2024 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

has as a vector 1 organism

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Ring-tailed Lemur Lemur catta Lemuridae	has as a vector	1	no location
1 source · 1 record Simmen, B. and Hladik, A. and Ramasiarisoa, P., 2003. Food intake and dietary overlap in native Lemur catta and Propithecus verreauxi and introduced Eulemur fulvus at Berenty; southern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 24(5), pp.949-968. Published in globalbioticinteractions/AfricaTreeDatabase Context: no place published · no date published · direct observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

is preyed upon by 1 organism

This term does declare that the organism harms this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Honey Bee Apis cerana Apidae	is preyed upon by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/256878480 Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist Context: no place published · Dec. 22, 2024 · Human observation A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

Interaction data from Global Biotic Interactions (GloBI), GloBI 0.11. Each row keeps the citation its own study published.

Interactions are published at species level: they are not resolved by variety or race.

Each block is headed by the source's own term, read from this species' end — not by a category of ours. Two similar terms are not merged.

«Documented here» means the interaction was observed in this territory. It is not evidence that the species is here, and it does not enter the niche model.

Acompañantes documentados

This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.

Documented uses and recommendations

Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.

Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.