Cabralea canjerana (Vell.) Mart.

← Back to the species catalog

Identidad taxonómica

Scientific name: Cabralea canjerana (Vell.) Mart.
Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.: Cabralea canjerana
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.: (Vell.) Mart.
Common names: Names in other languages (20)
Batea kaspi, Caierana, Cajarana, Cajá-espúrio, Cancharana, Canjarana, Canjarana-do-litoral, Canjerana, Canjerana-de-prego, Cedro macho, Mashía, Nawikobo, Pindaiborana, Rebenta Canralo, cajarana, canjarana, cangerana, canharana, cedro-canjerana, kabralea liečivá, pau-de-santo
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).: Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.: Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).: Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).: Sapindales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).: Meliaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.: Cabralea
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.: canjerana
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.: species
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.: accepted name

Photos and conservation status

IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.: Least concern (LC)
Source: IUCN Red List via GBIF, queried on 2026-10-13 10:53.

Photo of Cabralea canjerana (Vell.) Mart. — Photo: filipeprates · CC0 1.0 · View original image · Original observation

Research-grade iNaturalist observations via GBIF, CC0 or CC BY licences only, queried on 2026-10-13 10:53.

Interacciones documentadas

GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.

A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.

Types shown: 4 of 4 is eaten by × is dispersed by × is a host of × is a mutualist of ×

Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.

is eaten by 184 organisms

This term does declare that the organism harms this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Great Kiskadee Pitangus sulphuratus Tyrannidae	is eaten by	9	not compared
9 sources · 11 records doi:10.1002/ecy.1818 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bello2017 Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published M_SD_009 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published M_SD_012 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published M_SD_022 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Castro 2015 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Fontanari 2018 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Machado-de-Souza 2019 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Malacco da Silva 2014 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published And 1 more source, with fewer records, not listed here. A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Northern Streaked Flycatcher Myiodynastes maculatus Tyrannidae	is eaten by	8	not compared
8 sources · 11 records doi:10.1002/ecy.1818 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bello2017 Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published M_SD_009 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published M_SD_012 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published M_SD_022 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Castro 2015 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Fontanari 2018 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Machado-de-Souza 2019 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Purificacao 2014 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Tropical Kingbird Tyrannus melancholicus Tyrannidae	is eaten by	7	not compared
7 sources · 9 records doi:10.1002/ecy.1818 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bello2017 Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published M_SD_009 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published M_SD_012 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published M_SD_022 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Castro 2015 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Fontanari 2018 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Malacco da Silva 2014 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Green-winged Saltator Saltator similis Thraupidae	is eaten by	7	not compared
7 sources · 9 records doi:10.1002/ecy.1818 Published in globalbioticinteractions/bello2017 Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published M_SD_009 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published M_SD_012 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published M_SD_022 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Fontanari 2018 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Malacco da Silva 2014 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published Purificacao 2014 Published in globalbioticinteractions/fricke2020 Context: Brazil · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 184, by number of studies See more of this type

is dispersed by 11 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Blue Dacnis Dacnis cayana Thraupidae	is dispersed by	1	not compared
1 source · 2 records Galetti, M., Pizo, M.A. 1996. Fruit eating birds in a forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Ararajuba, Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 4: 71-79. Published in globalbioticinteractions/web-of-life Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Northern Streaked Flycatcher Myiodynastes maculatus Tyrannidae	is dispersed by	1	not compared
1 source · 2 records Galetti, M., Pizo, M.A. 1996. Fruit eating birds in a forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Ararajuba, Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 4: 71-79. Published in globalbioticinteractions/web-of-life Record contexts (sample): no place published · no date published; no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Variegated Flycatcher Empidonomus varius Tyrannidae	is dispersed by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record Galetti, M., Pizo, M.A. 1996. Fruit eating birds in a forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Ararajuba, Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 4: 71-79. Published in globalbioticinteractions/web-of-life Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Pale-breasted Thrush Turdus leucomelas Turdidae	is dispersed by	1	not compared
1 source · 1 record Galetti, M., Pizo, M.A. 1996. Fruit eating birds in a forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Ararajuba, Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 4: 71-79. Published in globalbioticinteractions/web-of-life Context: no place published · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 4 of 11, by number of studies See more of this type

is a host of 3 organisms

The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented
Dirce Beauty Colobura dirce Nymphalidae	is a host of	2	no location
2 sources · 2 records HOSTS DB Published in globalbioticinteractions/ferrer-paris Context: no place published · no date published Gaden S. Robinson; Phillip R. Ackery; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Luis M. Hernández (2023). HOSTS (from HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants) [Data set resource]. Natural History Museum. https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/hosts/resource/877f387a-36a3-486c-… Published in globalbioticinteractions/HOSTS Context: Brazil · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Megalopyge apicalis Megalopygidae	is a host of	1	no location
1 source · 1 record Gaden S. Robinson; Phillip R. Ackery; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Luis M. Hernández (2023). HOSTS (from HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants) [Data set resource]. Natural History Museum. https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/hosts/resource/877f387a-36a3-486c-… Published in globalbioticinteractions/HOSTS Context: Brazil · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Hidripa perdix Saturniidae	is a host of	1	no location
1 source · 1 record Gaden S. Robinson; Phillip R. Ackery; Ian Kitching; George W Beccaloni; Luis M. Hernández (2023). HOSTS (from HOSTS - a Database of the World's Lepidopteran Hostplants) [Data set resource]. Natural History Museum. https://data.nhm.ac.uk/dataset/hosts/resource/877f387a-36a3-486c-… Published in globalbioticinteractions/HOSTS Context: Brazil · no date published A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 3 of 3, by number of studies

is a mutualist of 1 organism

This term declares that the organism benefits this species.

Organism	Reads as	Studies	Where it was documented	Actions
Red-rumped Cacique Cacicus haemorrhous Icteridae	is a mutualist of	1	not compared
1 source · 2 records @article{article, author = {Silva, Wesley and De Marco Junior, Paulo and Hasui, Erica and Gomes, Veronica}, year = {2002}, month = {01}, pages = {}, title = {Patterns of Fruit-Frugivore Interactions in Two Atlantic Forest Bird Communities of South-eastern Brazil:Implications for… Published in globalbioticinteractions/mangal Record contexts (sample): no place published · March 1, 2000 · field observation/fecal analysis; no place published · March 1, 2000 · field observation/fecal analysis A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.

Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies

Interaction data from Global Biotic Interactions (GloBI), GloBI 0.11. Each row keeps the citation its own study published.

Interactions are published at species level: they are not resolved by variety or race.

Each block is headed by the source's own term, read from this species' end — not by a category of ours. Two similar terms are not merged.

«Documented here» means the interaction was observed in this territory. It is not evidence that the species is here, and it does not enter the niche model.

Acompañantes documentados

This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.

Documented uses and recommendations

Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.

Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.