Canonical name: The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L. — The scientific name without its authorship or date, for example Zea mays instead of Zea mays L.
Arbutus xalapensis
Authorship: The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank. — The author or authors credited with publishing the scientific name. It is written after the name, sometimes with the year, for example L. (Linnaeus) in Zea mays L. An author in parentheses first published the name in another genus or rank.
Kunth
Common names
Texas madroneNames in other languages (7)Madroño, Madroño Méxicano, Madrón, panángksi, Земляничник халапский, קטלב בלוטי, 德州漿果鵑
Kingdom: One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi). — One of the broadest ranks of biological classification. It groups organisms that share very basic features, for example plants (Plantae), animals (Animalia) or fungi (Fungi).
Plantae
Phylum: Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division. — Rank below kingdom that groups organisms with a shared general body plan, for example chordates (Chordata), arthropods (Arthropoda) or vascular plants (Tracheophyta). In botany the same rank is also called division.
Tracheophyta
Class: Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida). — Rank below phylum, for example mammals (Mammalia), birds (Aves), insects (Insecta) or monocot plants such as grasses and orchids (Liliopsida).
Magnoliopsida
Order: Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera). — Rank below class that groups related families, for example grasses and their relatives (Poales) or bats (Chiroptera).
Ericales
Family: Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family). — Rank below order that groups related genera. Family names usually end in -aceae in botany (for example Poaceae, the grass family) and in -idae in zoology (for example Felidae, the cat family).
Ericaceae
Genus: Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays. — Rank that groups closely related species. Its name is the first word of a species' scientific name and starts with a capital letter, for example Zea in Zea mays.
Arbutus
Specific epithet: The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays. — The second word of a species' scientific name. On its own it does not name the species: it always goes with the genus, for example mays in Zea mays.
xalapensis
Taxonomic rank: The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies. — The level a name occupies in the hierarchy of biological classification, such as kingdom, family, genus, species or subspecies.
species
Reference species
Arbutus xalapensis
Taxonomic status: Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful. — Whether the taxonomic catalogue the record comes from currently accepts this name for the organism, or treats it as a synonym of another accepted name or as doubtful.
accepted name
Photos and conservation status
IUCN Red List category: The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area. — The extinction-risk category that the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assigns to a species on its Red List. EX Extinct: there is no reasonable doubt that the last individual has died. EW Extinct in the wild: it survives only in cultivation, in captivity or as a population far outside its past range. CR Critically endangered, EN Endangered and VU Vulnerable: the three threatened categories, from an extremely high to a high risk of extinction in the wild. NT Near threatened: close to qualifying as threatened. LC Least concern: evaluated and not threatened. DD Data deficient: there is not enough information to assess its risk. NE Not evaluated: not yet assessed against the criteria. It describes the risk of the species worldwide, not its situation in a project's area.
Not available.
No photos have been requested for this species yet.
Interacciones documentadas
GloBI says it is documented somewhere in the world. Biolitica answers whether it could happen here.
A documented interaction means it was recorded somewhere in the world. It does not mean it occurs here.
Types shown: 6 of 6
is a host of
×
interacts with (this species is the record's destination)
×
is eaten by
×
interacts with (this species is the record's origin)
×
has its flowers visited by
×
is adjacent to
×
Blocks that do not sit under a navigation concept heading keep the source's own term: no navigation concept has been assigned to them yet.
is a host of
8 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. In the source ontology symbiosis covers mutualism, commensalism and parasitism alike, so this block holds attackers and allies side by side.
Context: Coronado National Forest, Santa Catalina Mountains Camp Apache to Soldier Camp · Oct. 14, 1911 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Coronado National Forest, Santa Catalina Mountains Camp Apache to Soldier Camp · Oct. 14, 1911 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1911-10-14T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L17016504
Context: Coronado National Forest, Santa Catalina Mountains Camp Apache to Soldier Camp · Oct. 14, 1911 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Coronado National Forest, Santa Catalina Mountains Camp Apache to Soldier Camp · Oct. 14, 1911 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1911-10-14T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L17016505
Context: Coronado National Forest, Santa Catalina Mountains Camp Apache to Soldier Camp · Oct. 14, 1911 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Coronado National Forest, Santa Catalina Mountains Camp Apache to Soldier Camp · Oct. 14, 1911 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1911-10-14T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L17016506
Context: Coronado National Forest, Santa Catalina Mountains Camp Apache to Soldier Camp · Oct. 14, 1911 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Coronado National Forest, Santa Catalina Mountains Camp Apache to Soldier Camp · Oct. 14, 1911 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1911-10-14T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L17016507
Spaulding, P.. 1961. Foreign Diseases of Forest Trees of the World. U.S.D.A. Agric. Handb. 197:1-361
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Guatemala · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Guatemala · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4109931
No public URL for this record
Gallegos, M.L., and Cummins, G.B.. 1981. Uredinales (royas) de Mexico, Vol. 2. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agricoles, Culiacan, Sinaloa, Mexico :492
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Mexico · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Mexico · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4166288
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Klopfenstein, N.B., Hanna, J.W., Cannon, P.G., Medel-Ortiz, R., Alvarado-Rosales, D., Lorea-Hernandez, F., Elias-Roman, R.D., and Kim, M.-S.. 2014. First report of the Armillaria root-disease pathogen, %Armillaria gallica%, associated with several woody hosts in three states of …
Published in globalbioticinteractions/usda-fungus-host
Context: Mexico · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Mexico · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4428232
No public URL for this record
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Published in globalbioticinteractions/arthropodEasyCaptureAMNH
Record contexts (sample): Washington · March 28, 1979 · Preserved specimen; Washington · March 28, 1979 · LabelObservation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Washington · March 28, 1979 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1979-03-28T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L15901472
Washington · March 28, 1979 · LabelObservationAs published: 1979-03-28T00:00:00Z · LabelObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L15901473
Washington · March 28, 1979 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1979-03-28T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L15901581
And 1 more record of this source, not listed here.
Context: no place published · May 11, 2023 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · May 11, 2023 · Human observationAs published: 2023-05-11T14:34:27Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5473740
Published in globalbioticinteractions/arthropodEasyCaptureAMNH
Record contexts (sample): 10 km E of Yecora on Hiway 16 · May 5, 2005 · Preserved specimen; 10 km E of Yecora on Hiway 16 · May 5, 2005 · LabelObservation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
10 km E of Yecora on Hiway 16 · May 5, 2005 · Preserved specimenAs published: 2005-05-05T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L15754636
10 km E of Yecora on Hiway 16 · May 5, 2005 · LabelObservationAs published: 2005-05-05T00:00:00Z · LabelObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L15754637
@article{123865, author = {Sanborn, Allen Francis and Phillips, Polly K.}, journal = {Diversity}, month = {apr}, day = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {166-239}, publisher = {MDPI AG}, title = {Biogeography of the Cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) of North America, North…
Published in globalbioticinteractions/taxonworks
Context: no place published · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5967086
Context: no place published · April 3, 2024 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · April 3, 2024 · Human observationAs published: 2024-04-03T15:10:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4774986
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Ruby-crowned KingletCorthylio calendulaRegulidae
is eaten by
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/10455434
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · March 27, 2018 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · March 27, 2018 · Human observationAs published: 2018-03-27T15:51:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4750095
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Padaeus trivittatusPentatomidae
is eaten by
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/13654403
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · June 20, 2018 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · June 20, 2018 · Human observationAs published: 2018-06-20T22:02:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4805341
Context: Along road in upper Green Gulch ca.; 8 miles Southwest of junction with Chisos Basin Road. · Dec. 15, 1980 · Preserved specimen
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Along road in upper Green Gulch ca.; 8 miles Southwest of junction with Chisos Basin Road. · Dec. 15, 1980 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1980-12-15T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12080269
Context: crest of Sierra Madre Occidental, 7.8 miles West of El Palmita ca.; 40 miles E of Concordia on Mexico Hwy. 40 · Jan. 30, 1962 · Preserved s…
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
crest of Sierra Madre Occidental, 7.8 miles West of El Palmita ca.; 40 miles E of Concordia on Mexico Hwy. 40 · Jan. 30, 1962 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1962-01-30T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12080272
Context: crest of Sierra Madre Occidental, 7.8 miles West of El Palmita ca.; 40 miles E of Concordia on Mexico Hwy. 40 · Jan. 30, 1962 · Preserved s…
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
crest of Sierra Madre Occidental, 7.8 miles West of El Palmita ca.; 40 miles E of Concordia on Mexico Hwy. 40 · Jan. 30, 1962 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1962-01-30T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12080273
Context: crest of Sierra Madre Occidental, 7.8 miles West of El Palmita ca.; 40 miles E of Concordia on Mexico Hwy. 40 · Jan. 30, 1962 · Preserved s…
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
crest of Sierra Madre Occidental, 7.8 miles West of El Palmita ca.; 40 miles E of Concordia on Mexico Hwy. 40 · Jan. 30, 1962 · Preserved specimenAs published: 1962-01-30T00:00:00Z · PreservedSpecimenWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L12080271
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 4 of 4, by number of studies
Flower visit
has its flowers visited by
3 organisms
The authority declares no effect on this species for this term: neither that it harms it nor that it benefits it. Visiting a flower is not pollinating it. «Pollinates» is a different term and a different block, and merging the two is the measured defect that turned ~88 shared «pollinators» into birds and primates.
Organism
Reads as
Studies
Where it was documented
Actions
Limenitis bredowiiNymphalidae
has its flowers visited by
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/66712729
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · Dec. 17, 2020 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Dec. 17, 2020 · Human observationAs published: 2020-12-17T17:08:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L5681505
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Echo AzureCelastrina echo
has its flowers visited by
1
not compared
1 source · 1 record
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/9575142
Published in globalbioticinteractions/inaturalist
Context: no place published · Jan. 21, 2018 · Human observation
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
no place published · Jan. 21, 2018 · Human observationAs published: 2018-01-21T00:00:00Z · HumanObservationWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L4730177
Published in millerse/Hummingbird-and-Flower-Interactions
Context: Sonora · no date published
Claim type
Published relationship between two taxa
Version
GloBI 0.11
Reuse
This release publishes no reuse terms for this record.
Sonora · no date publishedWhere it is: line:hash://sha256/021a206a1459bcca7e251c73f5bd180fc3ac342a09c499855fe42e21fc09edcf!/interactions.tsv.gz!/L147226
A published relationship says these two taxa were documented interacting. It does not say how often, or that it happens in this project's region.
Showing 1 of 1, by number of studies
Acompañantes documentados
This agronomic reading comes from a source reserved for internal use, so it is not shown here.
Documented uses and recommendations
Uses and recommendations that a source documents for this species beside a crop, each in its own context. They are the source's statements, not traits of the species and not Biolítica's recommendations, and none of them is a relation between two species.
Among the sources you can read, none documents a use or recommendation of this species beside a crop.